All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Vote by Mail: Voter Preferences and Self-Reported Voting Behavior
Unformatted Document Text:  13 References Berinsky, Adam, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott. (2001). “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178-197. Elazar, Daniel. (1984). American Federalism: A View from the States. 3 rd ed. New York: Harper & Row. Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2001). “Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and Participation.” American Politics Research 29:183-195. Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2000). “Going Postal: How All-Mail Elections Influence Turnout.” Political Behavior 22: 223-239. Oregon Annual Social Indicators Survey. (2003). Oregon Survey Research Laboratory, University of Oregon.. Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (1997) “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate Election in the State of Oregon,” PS: Political Science and Politics 91: 53-57. Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (2000) “Does Changing the Rules Change the Players? Vote-by-Mail and the Composition of the Electorate,” Social Science Quarterly 81: 837-845. Traugott, Michael. W. (1996). Report on the Characteristics of the Oregon Electorate Participating in the Special General Election for the U.S. Senate on January 30, 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Authors: Southwell, Priscilla.
first   previous   Page 14 of 14   next   last



background image
13
References

Berinsky, Adam, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott. (2001). “Who Votes by Mail?
A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail
Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178-197.
Elazar, Daniel. (1984). American Federalism: A View from the States. 3
rd
ed. New York:
Harper & Row.
Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2001). “Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and
Participation.”
American Politics Research 29:183-195.
Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2000). “Going Postal: How All-Mail
Elections
Influence
Turnout.”
Political Behavior 22: 223-239.
Oregon Annual Social Indicators Survey. (2003). Oregon Survey Research Laboratory,
University of Oregon..
Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (1997) “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate
Election in the State of Oregon,” PS: Political Science and Politics 91: 53-57.
Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (2000) “Does Changing the Rules Change the
Players? Vote-by-Mail and the Composition of the Electorate,” Social Science
Quarterly 81: 837-845.
Traugott, Michael. W. (1996). Report on the Characteristics of the Oregon Electorate
Participating in the Special General Election for the U.S. Senate on January 30,
1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 14 of 14   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.