 |
I'm Changing the Climate! Ask Me How!: The Politics of the Anti-SUV Campaign
|
| |
|
|
“I’m Changing the Climate, Ask Me How!”: The Politics of the Anti-SUV Campaign
Sarah Pralle
Department of Political Science
Maxwell School at Syracuse University
## email not listed ##
Abstract:
This paper examines the politics of the nascent grassroots campaign against Sports Utility
Vehicles (SUVs) and their drivers. The anti-SUV campaign is another example of the
politicization of private citizen behavior, a topic recently reviewed by Kersh and Morone (2002)
in their analysis of the politics of obesity. The anti-SUV campaign shares some elements with the
public health campaigns investigated by Kersh and Morone and with other moral reform
movements. Like these other efforts, the anti-SUV campaign stigmatizes putatively private
behavior using explicit and implicit moral appeals, it seeks to govern the self and others, and it
demonizes both individuals and corporations. But it does not fit the typical mold of earlier
crusades in two key ways. First, the anti-SUV campaign reverses the class, and to some extent
the racial politics that underlies other efforts to control private behavior. Second, the SUV
backlash relies to a great extent on humor and a sense of play, rather than the politics of fear.
I argue that while the movement has progressive roots, its critique is ultimately too
limited in scope to have a significant policy impact. The limitations of the campaign stem from
tensions in American political culture that the anti-SUV campaign confronts, the most significant
of which is America’s ambivalence toward consumption. While institutional constraints,
mobilization biases, and a lack of political leadership also pose challenges to policy reform, this
paper focuses on the cultural and ideological challenges posed by America’s attitudes toward
consumption.
Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting
of the American Political Science Association, Sept. 2-Sept. 5, 2004.
Copyright by the American Political Science Association
|
|
 Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| | Unformatted Document Text:
“I’m Changing the Climate, Ask Me How!”: The Politics of the Anti-SUV Campaign
Sarah Pralle
Department of Political Science
Maxwell School at Syracuse University
## email not listed ##
Abstract:
This paper examines the politics of the nascent grassroots campaign against Sports Utility
Vehicles (SUVs) and their drivers. The anti-SUV campaign is another example of the politicization of private citizen behavior, a topic recently reviewed by Kersh and Morone (2002) in their analysis of the politics of obesity. The anti-SUV campaign shares some elements with the public health campaigns investigated by Kersh and Morone and with other moral reform movements. Like these other efforts, the anti-SUV campaign stigmatizes putatively private behavior using explicit and implicit moral appeals, it seeks to govern the self and others, and it demonizes both individuals and corporations. But it does not fit the typical mold of earlier crusades in two key ways. First, the anti-SUV campaign reverses the class, and to some extent the racial politics that underlies other efforts to control private behavior. Second, the SUV backlash relies to a great extent on humor and a sense of play, rather than the politics of fear.
I argue that while the movement has progressive roots, its critique is ultimately too
limited in scope to have a significant policy impact. The limitations of the campaign stem from tensions in American political culture that the anti-SUV campaign confronts, the most significant of which is America’s ambivalence toward consumption. While institutional constraints, mobilization biases, and a lack of political leadership also pose challenges to policy reform, this paper focuses on the cultural and ideological challenges posed by America’s attitudes toward consumption.
Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting
of the American Political Science Association, Sept. 2-Sept. 5, 2004.
Copyright by the American Political Science Association
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 32 
