All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Cracking the White “Solid South” with the Nexus of Race and Religion: The 1960’s as Transition?
Unformatted Document Text:  The American voting public has shifted substantially since the mid-1970's toward the Republican Party. The leading indicator of this change has been the presidential vote. The once-majority Democrats have captured only a minority of the white vote in each of the last six presidential elections and their only victories, in 1992 and 1996, seem to have been partially contingent on the strong third-party candidacies of Ross Perot. The Republicans took control of the House of Representatives in 1994 for the first time in nearly half a century, and they have controlled the Senate for much of the past two decades. In state politics, the once healthy Democratic majority of the governorships has switched to a strong Republican majority. Republicans have come to parity in the state legislatures as well. And in terms of whites’ underlying party identifications, Republicans have nearly erased the stable majority once held by Democrats. When we examine trends over time, it is apparent that major shift to the Republican Party has occurred among white Southerners. i This is quite apparent for presidential voting. The “Solid South” voted reliably more for Democratic presidential candidates than for Republicans from the “Compromise of 1877" to the Dixiecrat rebellion of 1948, but it began slipping away from the Democrats in the early 1960's, and has been eroding ever since (Black & Black, 2002; Petrocik, 1987; Sundquist, 1983). The decline of the Democrats’ hegemony in the white South has been equally precipitous in other indicators. When President Eisenhower took office, in 1953, Democrats held every Southern Senate seat and 94% of the Southern seats in the House of Representatives. When George W. Bush took office, in 2001, they held just over 40% of the Southern seats in each chamber (Abramson et al., 2002, p. 203). The Democrats’ huge advantage in white Southerners’ party identifications in the 1960's has dropped sharply as well (e.g., Miller & Shanks, 1996; Converse, 1966). In succession, the Democrats have also lost their once-commanding lead in gubernatorial and state legislative seats (for the details of these changes, see the excellent accounts by Black and Black, 1987; 1992; 2002; also Bullock and Rozell, 1998; Jewett, 1999). And it appears from some early soundings that the 2000 elections marked yet a further sharp rise in the 3

Authors: Sears, David. and Valentino, Nicholas.
first   previous   Page 3 of 49   next   last



background image
The American voting public has shifted substantially since the mid-1970's toward the Republican
Party. The leading indicator of this change has been the presidential vote. The once-majority Democrats
have captured only a minority of the white vote in each of the last six presidential elections and their only
victories, in 1992 and 1996, seem to have been partially contingent on the strong third-party candidacies
of Ross Perot. The Republicans took control of the House of Representatives in 1994 for the first time in
nearly half a century, and they have controlled the Senate for much of the past two decades. In state
politics, the once healthy Democratic majority of the governorships has switched to a strong Republican
majority. Republicans have come to parity in the state legislatures as well. And in terms of whites’
underlying party identifications, Republicans have nearly erased the stable majority once held by
Democrats.
When we examine trends over time, it is apparent that major shift to the Republican Party has
occurred among white Southerners.
This is quite apparent for presidential voting. The “Solid South”
voted reliably more for Democratic presidential candidates than for Republicans from the “Compromise
of 1877" to the Dixiecrat rebellion of 1948, but it began slipping away from the Democrats in the early
1960's, and has been eroding ever since (Black & Black, 2002; Petrocik, 1987; Sundquist, 1983). The
decline of the Democrats’ hegemony in the white South has been equally precipitous in other indicators.
When President Eisenhower took office, in 1953, Democrats held every Southern Senate seat and 94% of
the Southern seats in the House of Representatives. When George W. Bush took office, in 2001, they
held just over 40% of the Southern seats in each chamber (Abramson et al., 2002, p. 203). The
Democrats’ huge advantage in white Southerners’ party identifications in the 1960's has dropped sharply
as well (e.g., Miller & Shanks, 1996; Converse, 1966). In succession, the Democrats have also lost their
once-commanding lead in gubernatorial and state legislative seats (for the details of these changes, see the
excellent accounts by Black and Black, 1987; 1992; 2002; also Bullock and Rozell, 1998; Jewett, 1999).
And it appears from some early soundings that the 2000 elections marked yet a further sharp rise in the
3


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 49   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.