All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Buying" Votes in Japan's Lower House
Unformatted Document Text:  24 Kawato Sadafumi. 1999. “Seiji Shikin to Senkyo Kyoso” [Political Money and Electoral Competition]. Leviathan 25:52-77. Kawato Sadafumi. 2002. “Senkyo Kyoryoku, Sakusen Tohyo, Seiji Shikin: 2000-nen Shosenkyo no Bunseki” [Electoral Cooperation, Strategic Voting, and Political Spending in the 2000 General Election]. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies 17:58-70. Levitt, Steven. 1994. “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.” The Journal of Political Economy 102:777-798. Mizuguchi Hiroshi. “Political Reform: Much Ado about Nothing?” Japan Quarterly 40:246-57. Mizusaki Tokifumi and Hiroki Mori. (1998). “Tokuhyo Deeta Kara Mita Heiritsusei no Mekanizumu” [The Impact of the New Electoral System on Voting Behavior and Campaign Strategies in 1996]. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies: 13:50-59. Otake Hideo. 1998. “Overview.” In Otake Hideo (ed.), How Electoral Reform Boomeranged. New York: Japan Center for International Exchange, vi-xxxi Ozawa Ichiro. 1994. Blueprint for a New Japan: Rethinking of a Nation. Tokyo: Kodansha. Reed, Steven. 1999. “Strategic Voting in the 1996 Japanese General Election.” Comparative Political Studies 32:257. Reed, Steven and Michael Thies. 2001. “The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan.” In Matthew Shugart and Martin Wattenberg (eds.), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? New York: Oxford University Press, 380-403. Sasaki Takeshi, Yoshida Shinichi, Tanaguchi Masaki and Yamamoto Shoji (eds.). 1999. Daigishi to Kane: Seiji Shikin Zenkoku Chosa Hokoku [Diet Members and Money: The Political Funds Nationwide Survey Report]. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun. Sato Seizaburo. 1997. “LDP Redivivus: The Failure of Electoral Reform.” Japan Echo 24:19-25. Schlesinger, Joseph. 1985. “The New American Political Party.” American Political Science Review 79:1152-69. Shugart, Mathew and John Carey. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14:417-439. Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Authors: Carlson, Matthew.
first   previous   Page 25 of 25   next   last



background image
24
Kawato Sadafumi. 1999. “Seiji Shikin to Senkyo Kyoso” [Political Money and Electoral
Competition]. Leviathan 25:52-77.

Kawato Sadafumi. 2002. “Senkyo Kyoryoku, Sakusen Tohyo, Seiji Shikin: 2000-nen
Shosenkyo no Bunseki” [Electoral Cooperation, Strategic Voting, and Political
Spending in the 2000 General Election]. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies
17:58-70.

Levitt, Steven. 1994. “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign
Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.” The Journal of Political
Economy 102:777-798.

Mizuguchi Hiroshi. “Political Reform: Much Ado about Nothing?” Japan Quarterly 40:246-57.

Mizusaki Tokifumi and Hiroki Mori. (1998). “Tokuhyo Deeta Kara Mita Heiritsusei no
Mekanizumu” [The Impact of the New Electoral System on Voting Behavior and
Campaign Strategies in 1996]. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies: 13:50-59.

Otake Hideo. 1998. “Overview.” In Otake Hideo (ed.), How Electoral Reform
Boomeranged. New York: Japan Center for International Exchange, vi-xxxi

Ozawa Ichiro. 1994. Blueprint for a New Japan: Rethinking of a Nation. Tokyo: Kodansha.

Reed, Steven. 1999. “Strategic Voting in the 1996 Japanese General Election.”
Comparative Political Studies 32:257.

Reed, Steven and Michael Thies. 2001. “The Consequences of Electoral Reform in
Japan.” In Matthew Shugart and Martin Wattenberg (eds.), Mixed-Member
Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? New York: Oxford University Press,
380-403.

Sasaki Takeshi, Yoshida Shinichi, Tanaguchi Masaki and Yamamoto Shoji (eds.). 1999.
Daigishi to Kane: Seiji Shikin Zenkoku Chosa Hokoku [Diet Members and
Money: The Political Funds Nationwide Survey Report]. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun.

Sato Seizaburo. 1997. “LDP Redivivus: The Failure of Electoral Reform.” Japan Echo 24:19-25.

Schlesinger, Joseph. 1985. “The New American Political Party.” American Political
Science Review 79:1152-69.

Shugart, Mathew and John Carey. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank
Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14:417-439.

Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 25 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.