All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Utopia as Parody of Humanist and Ecclesiastical Thought.
Unformatted Document Text:  Utopia: Unintended Consequences SE Hoaby Unintended Consequences: Flaws in Utopian Society 1 Scott E. Hoaby, April 2005 One of the most enigmatic questions about Utopia is what Thomas More may have been doing by writing it. Skinner notes that “almost everything about More’s Utopia is debatable.” (Skinner 1987, 123) Surtz cautions us that no one “is so foolish as to claim that the work is wholly jesting or wholly serious.”(Surtz PW, 4) These difficulties notwithstanding, an under-considered interpretation of Utopia is that it is a seriocomic parody of political theories discussed or reformulated in Renaissance humanist circles that were sedulously, though slowly, transforming both church and state in Europe. Most interpreters of Utopia emphasize its serious messages and put relatively little attention on the role that devices such as jest, parody, and irony may have in the text. By under considering the interplay of these literary devices with the serious issues in Utopia, they potentially miss an integral part of More’s ciphering and our subsequent potential for interpretive deciphering. What I wish to put forward in this paper is a theory about what More was doing by writing Utopia that fits roughly within the genre of seriocomic parody. More, it seems to me, is taking issue with theories he believes are not workable or are impractical. He introduces them attractively enough, and generally in a positive light, but the theories have unintended consequences or side-effects that are deleterious to these theories’ feasibilities. His voice for making light of these theories is Raphael Hythlodaeus. In making my argument, I will consider the book Utopia in its totality, examining not only Books I and II, but also, when appropriate, the 1 I would like to thank Giulia Sissa for her encouragement and help in writing this paper, which at present is still a work in progress. I should also thank my classmates who provided encouragement and useful comments on initial drafts of some of the ideas presented in these pages. 2

Authors: Hoaby, Scott.
first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last



background image
Utopia: Unintended Consequences
SE
Hoaby
Unintended Consequences:
Flaws in Utopian Society
Scott E. Hoaby, April 2005
One of the most enigmatic questions about Utopia is what Thomas More may have been
doing by writing it. Skinner notes that “almost everything about More’s Utopia is debatable.”
(Skinner 1987, 123) Surtz cautions us that no one “is so foolish as to claim that the work is
wholly jesting or wholly serious.”(Surtz PW, 4)
These difficulties notwithstanding, an under-considered interpretation of Utopia is that it is a
seriocomic parody of political theories discussed or reformulated in Renaissance humanist
circles that were sedulously, though slowly, transforming both church and state in Europe. Most
interpreters of Utopia emphasize its serious messages and put relatively little attention on the
role that devices such as jest, parody, and irony may have in the text. By under considering the
interplay of these literary devices with the serious issues in Utopia, they potentially miss an
integral part of More’s ciphering and our subsequent potential for interpretive deciphering.
What I wish to put forward in this paper is a theory about what More was doing by writing
Utopia that fits roughly within the genre of seriocomic parody. More, it seems to me, is taking
issue with theories he believes are not workable or are impractical. He introduces them
attractively enough, and generally in a positive light, but the theories have unintended
consequences or side-effects that are deleterious to these theories’ feasibilities. His voice for
making light of these theories is Raphael Hythlodaeus. In making my argument, I will consider
the book Utopia in its totality, examining not only Books I and II, but also, when appropriate, the
1
I would like to thank Giulia Sissa for her encouragement and help in writing this paper, which at present is still a
work in progress. I should also thank my classmates who provided encouragement and useful comments on
initial drafts of some of the ideas presented in these pages.
2


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.