All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Assessing the Effects of Decentralization on Economic Inequality, Human Development, and Economic Growth: A Simultaneous-Equations Models Analysis
Unformatted Document Text:  32 Treisman, D. 2000a. “Decentralization and the quality of government.” Department of Political Science Working Paper. Los Angeles: Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles. Treisman, D. 2000b. Decentralization and inflation: Commitment, collective action, or continuity? American Political Science Review, 94(4), 837–857. Treisman, Daniel. 2000c. “Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94(4): 837-858. Treisman, Daniel. 2000c. “The Determinants of Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics 76: 399-457. Vincent Mahle. 2002. “Exploring the Subnational Dimension of Income Inequality.” Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 292. Wibbels, Erik, 2000. “Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance,” American Journal of Political Science, 44 (4): 687-702. Williamson, Jeffrey, “Regional Inequality and Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns,” Economic Development and Cultural Change Vol. XIII, No. 4, Part II, July 1965, p. 2- 84. Willis Eliza, Cristopher da C.B.Garman, Stephan Haggard. 1999. “The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America.” Latin America Research Review, Vol. 34(1). Woller, G., & Phillips, K. 1998. “Fiscal decentralization and LDC economic growth: An empirical investigation.” Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 139–148. Zhang, T., & Zou, H. 1997. “Fiscal decentralization, the composition of public spending, and regional growth in India.” Development Research Group Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank. Zhang, T., & Zou, H. 1998. “Fiscal decentralization, public spending and economic growth in China.” Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221–240. Zhang,Tao and Heng-fu Zou. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, Economic Growth in China. Policy Research Working Paper 1608. World Bank: Washington D.C.

first   previous   Page 34 of 34   next   last



background image
32
Treisman, D. 2000a. “Decentralization and the quality of government.” Department of Political Science
Working Paper. Los Angeles: Department of Political Science, University of California, Los
Angeles.
Treisman, D. 2000b. Decentralization and inflation: Commitment, collective action, or continuity?
American Political Science Review, 94(4), 837–857.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000c. “Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or
Continuity.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94(4): 837-858.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000c. “The Determinants of Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics 76: 399-457.
Vincent Mahle. 2002. “Exploring the Subnational Dimension of Income Inequality.” Luxembourg Income
Study Working Paper No. 292.
Wibbels, Erik, 2000. “Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance,” American
Journal of Political Science, 44 (4): 687-702.
Williamson, Jeffrey, “Regional Inequality and Process of National Development: A Description of the
Patterns,” Economic Development and Cultural Change Vol. XIII, No. 4, Part II, July 1965, p. 2-
84.
Willis Eliza, Cristopher da C.B.Garman, Stephan Haggard. 1999. “The Politics of Decentralization in
Latin America.” Latin America Research Review, Vol. 34(1).
Woller, G., & Phillips, K. 1998. “Fiscal decentralization and LDC economic growth: An empirical
investigation.” Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 139–148.
Zhang, T., & Zou, H. 1997. “Fiscal decentralization, the composition of public spending, and regional
growth in India.” Development Research Group Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zhang, T., & Zou, H. 1998. “Fiscal decentralization, public spending and economic growth in China.”
Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221–240.
Zhang,Tao and Heng-fu Zou. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, Economic Growth in
China. Policy Research Working Paper 1608. World Bank: Washington D.C.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 34 of 34   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.