All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Factors Influencing Adoption of Digital Medical Records: Individual Characteristics, Privacy, and Technology Attributes
Unformatted Document Text:  Adoption of Digital Medical Records, p-1 Factors Influencing Adoption of Digital Medical Records: Individual Characteristics, Privacy, and Technology Attributes National and Regional Implementations of Digital Medial Records Digital Medical Records The nature of health care in the US, largely HMO based, is driving the implementation of digital medical records systems (DMRs), in response to a demand for data transparency, reduced costs, and better health care (Gunter & Terry, 2005). Concerns over medical mistakes, the widespread occurrence of ambulatory care, and the increasing responsibility among patients for their health care are among the reasons DMRs have become a priority for health care providers. However, providers must also respond to patient demands for privacy, access, correction, and consent, as well as legislative demands for legal compliance (Gunter & Terry, 2005). DMRs are credited with improving health care by reducing medical errors, eliminating handwritten clinical notes, enabling error-reducing technologies, increasing the consistency of medical records, and providing data for research (Reynolds, 2003). Several studies have also cited benefits for both physicians and patients (Hassol et al., 2004; Joustra-Enquist & Eklund, 2004). For example, Wang, Lau, Matsen, and Kim (2004) developed a web-based personal health record (PHR) for patients to collect and manage their health information (medical history, past surgeries, medications, and allergies), to request self-referrals, and to store a record of their consultations. Thirty-two patients completed a survey in which 85% of respondents were satisfied with the usability and 94% were satisfied with the overall online referral process. Using DMRs in hospital databases helps ensure consistent and correct coding by physicians, as well as context-sensitive treatment (Muller, Burkle, Irps, Roeder, & Prokosch, 2003). A study of the 30% of physicians using DMRs in 2003 reported that 78% saw an improvement in patient

Authors: Wallis, Kier. and Rice, Ronald.
first   previous   Page 1 of 32   next   last



background image
Adoption of Digital Medical Records, p-1
Factors Influencing Adoption of Digital Medical Records:
Individual Characteristics, Privacy, and Technology Attributes
National and Regional Implementations of Digital Medial Records
Digital Medical Records
The nature of health care in the US, largely HMO based, is driving the implementation of
digital medical records systems (DMRs), in response to a demand for data transparency, reduced
costs, and better health care (Gunter & Terry, 2005). Concerns over medical mistakes, the
widespread occurrence of ambulatory care, and the increasing responsibility among patients for
their health care are among the reasons DMRs have become a priority for health care providers.
However, providers must also respond to patient demands for privacy, access, correction, and
consent, as well as legislative demands for legal compliance (Gunter & Terry, 2005).
DMRs are credited with improving health care by reducing medical errors, eliminating
handwritten clinical notes, enabling error-reducing technologies, increasing the consistency of
medical records, and providing data for research (Reynolds, 2003). Several studies have also
cited benefits for both physicians and patients (Hassol et al., 2004; Joustra-Enquist & Eklund,
2004). For example, Wang, Lau, Matsen, and Kim (2004) developed a web-based personal
health record (PHR) for patients to collect and manage their health information (medical history,
past surgeries, medications, and allergies), to request self-referrals, and to store a record of their
consultations. Thirty-two patients completed a survey in which 85% of respondents were
satisfied with the usability and 94% were satisfied with the overall online referral process. Using
DMRs in hospital databases helps ensure consistent and correct coding by physicians, as well as
context-sensitive treatment (Muller, Burkle, Irps, Roeder, & Prokosch, 2003). A study of the
30% of physicians using DMRs in 2003 reported that 78% saw an improvement in patient


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.