 |
The Chechen Conflict: Securitisation or Normalisation?
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
be ‘fundamentally restructured’,
78
the idea that Chechnya is undergoing a process of
normalisation seems intuitively untenable. Nonetheless, it can be argued that the discourse of normalisation serves as a tactic on the part of the regime – just as much as the discourse of securitisation does – seeking to create an impression amongst the populace both in Chechnya and in Russia itself, as well as in the international community, that the government is in control, that life for the ordinary people is improving, and that the state’s policy is not just a military one, but that it also involves tackling Chechnya’s severe socio-economic problems.
It is also worthy of note that, throughout the fierce attacks by Chechen terrorists
on Russian targets in recent years, Putin’s discourse on Chechnya, particularly in a domestic context, remained firmly committed to political normalisation through the support of accelerated reconstruction, social provisions and economic recovery. It is a different matter that these events effected a notable securitisation of other, sometimes seemingly unrelated issues. The French journalist Gwen Roche has remarked that, although for the time being the Putin leadership’s insistent discourse on the ‘de-securitisation’ and normalisation of Chechnya appear nothing more than wishful thinking, it might have a positive psychological effect on the atmosphere in the republic in the long term.
As a result of … the often proclaimed ‘normalisation’, two parallel worlds have been established in Chechnya. On the one hand, there is the real state of war with the occupying forces responding to guerrilla actions against military targets with massive repressions of the civilian population. On the other hand, there is the official Russian representation, which might appear surreal, but is gaining in realistic content in every-day Chechen life.
79
78
ibid.
79
G. Roche, ‘Krieg und Normalisierung in Tschetschenien’, Le Monde Diplomatique (Germany), No
7077, 13 June 2003.
17
|
| |
| |
|
|
be ‘fundamentally restructured’,
the idea that Chechnya is undergoing a process of
normalisation seems intuitively untenable. Nonetheless, it can be argued that the discourse of normalisation serves as a tactic on the part of the regime – just as much as the discourse of securitisation does – seeking to create an impression amongst the populace both in Chechnya and in Russia itself, as well as in the international community, that the government is in control, that life for the ordinary people is improving, and that the state’s policy is not just a military one, but that it also involves tackling Chechnya’s severe socio-economic problems.
It is also worthy of note that, throughout the fierce attacks by Chechen terrorists
on Russian targets in recent years, Putin’s discourse on Chechnya, particularly in a domestic context, remained firmly committed to political normalisation through the support of accelerated reconstruction, social provisions and economic recovery. It is a different matter that these events effected a notable securitisation of other, sometimes seemingly unrelated issues. The French journalist Gwen Roche has remarked that, although for the time being the Putin leadership’s insistent discourse on the ‘de- securitisation’ and normalisation of Chechnya appear nothing more than wishful thinking, it might have a positive psychological effect on the atmosphere in the republic in the long term.
As a result of … the often proclaimed ‘normalisation’, two parallel worlds have been established in Chechnya. On the one hand, there is the real state of war with the occupying forces responding to guerrilla actions against military targets with massive repressions of the civilian population. On the other hand, there is the official Russian representation, which might appear surreal, but is gaining in realistic content in every-day Chechen life.
78
ibid.
79
G. Roche, ‘Krieg und Normalisierung in Tschetschenien’, Le Monde Diplomatique (Germany), No
7077, 13 June 2003.
17
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|