 |
Regime Type and Conflict: Broadening the Theory
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Regime Type and Conflict: Broadening the theory Benjamin E. Goldsmith, Stephan K. Chalup, and Michael J. Quinlan University of Newcastle, Australia Abstract: In this paper we take a new look at the relationship between regime type and deadly militarized conflict among pairs of states (dyads) in the international system. With the goal of describing the general functional form of the relationship, we evaluate three hypotheses: democratic peace, regime similarity, and regime rationality. We employ both standard logit methods and a recently developed machine learning technique, a support vector machine (SVM). Logit is dependent on assumptions which limit flexibility and make it difficult to discern the appropriate functional form. SVM estimation, on the other hand, is highly flexible and appears capable of discovering a general functional form that is contingent on the values of other variables in the model. SVM results indicate that regime similarity is important in most dyadic interactions. However, for the special but important case of the most dangerous dyads (including enduring rivalries), regime rationality plays a role and the democratic peace effect is dominant. The results suggest that models of international conflict excluding distinct indicators for both political similarity and joint democracy are mis-specified and likely suffer from omitted variable bias. The importance of accounting for interactions between regime type and other correlates of war is also evident. SVMs are an especially useful complement to more conventional statistical methods. In addition to their other virtues, our SVM models are at least equivalent to logit in out-of-sample predictive power. Acknowledgements We thank Adrian Mander for help with his surface graph function for Stata. Goldsmith gratefully acknowledges support under a University of Newcastle New Staff Grant. We thank Yusaku Horiuchi and participants in a Newcastle School of Policy research seminar for valuable comments. This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2006 annual convention of the International Studies Association, 22-25 March, San Diego, California, USA.
Comments are welcome.
Please direct correspondence to benjamin.## email not listed ##.
|
| | Authors: Goldsmith, Benjamin., Chalup, Stephan. and Quinlan, Michael. |
|
| |
|
|
Regime Type and Conflict: Broadening the theory
Benjamin E. Goldsmith, Stephan K. Chalup, and Michael J. Quinlan
University of Newcastle, Australia
Abstract: In this paper we take a new look at the relationship between regime type and deadly
militarized conflict among pairs of states (dyads) in the international system. With the goal of
describing the general functional form of the relationship, we evaluate three hypotheses:
democratic peace, regime similarity, and regime rationality. We employ both standard logit
methods and a recently developed machine learning technique, a support vector machine (SVM).
Logit is dependent on assumptions which limit flexibility and make it difficult to discern the
appropriate functional form. SVM estimation, on the other hand, is highly flexible and appears
capable of discovering a general functional form that is contingent on the values of other
variables in the model. SVM results indicate that regime similarity is important in most dyadic
interactions. However, for the special but important case of the most dangerous dyads (including
enduring rivalries), regime rationality plays a role and the democratic peace effect is dominant.
The results suggest that models of international conflict excluding distinct indicators for both
political similarity and joint democracy are mis-specified and likely suffer from omitted variable
bias. The importance of accounting for interactions between regime type and other correlates of
war is also evident. SVMs are an especially useful complement to more conventional statistical
methods. In addition to their other virtues, our SVM models are at least equivalent to logit in out-
of-sample predictive power.
Acknowledgements
We thank Adrian Mander for help with his surface graph function for Stata. Goldsmith gratefully
acknowledges support under a University of Newcastle New Staff Grant. We thank Yusaku
Horiuchi and participants in a Newcastle School of Policy research seminar for valuable
comments.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2006 annual convention of the International
Studies Association, 22-25 March, San Diego, California, USA.
Comments are welcome.
Please direct correspondence to benjamin.## email not listed ##.
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 40 
