All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Community Economic Development Strategies in Rural Washington: Toward a Synthesis of Natural and Social Capital
Unformatted Document Text:  Community Economic Development Strategies in Rural Washington: Toward a Synthesis of Natural and Social Capital By Jessica Crowe Department of Sociology Washington State University Introduction Structural changes and technological advances in traditional rural sectors, such as agriculture and manufacturing, along with advances in shipping and the notion of “free trade” pose a threat to the survival of rural communities as homes and places of work (Sharp, Agnitsch, Ryan, Flora 2002). Many rural communities have initiated economic development strategies to try to recruit, create, keep, and boost local economic endeavors. Similarly, these same structural factors pose a threat to the survival of ecosystems as resources are extracted at a faster pace and shipped to all parts of the world for consumption and processing (Foster 1999). In response to these structural changes on the environment, environmentalists, over the course of several decades, have fought for stricter environmental regulations with regards to extracting resources and dumping the end waste (Foster 1999). In the Pacific Northwest, where the communities in this study are located, the two have often been pitted against one another in the common slogan, “jobs vs. owls” (Carroll 1995; Foster 1999). Referring to the spotted owl, who makes its home in the old-growth part of the forest and requires a large hunting and breeding ground, this phrase implies that one can either retain jobs at the environments expense or preserve local ecosystems—but not both. In the past, the two were researched exclusively. For example, environmentalists, such as the Sierra Club and Audubon Society, focused on preserving ecosystems while ignoring the effects that new legislation may have on the number and quality of jobs in the area (Foster 1999; Pellow 2002). On the other hand, several community activists and sociologists focused on building community economic development, while ignoring any impacts it may have on the surrounding environment (e.g. see Summers 1986). However, recently, several environmental sociologists and community sociologists have begun to emphasize the importance of creating socially and environmentally

Authors: Crowe, Jessica.
first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last



background image
Community Economic Development Strategies in Rural Washington:
Toward a Synthesis of Natural and Social Capital
By Jessica Crowe
Department of Sociology
Washington State University
Introduction
Structural changes and technological advances in traditional rural sectors, such as
agriculture and manufacturing, along with advances in shipping and the notion of “free
trade” pose a threat to the survival of rural communities as homes and places of work
(Sharp, Agnitsch, Ryan, Flora 2002). Many rural communities have initiated economic
development strategies to try to recruit, create, keep, and boost local economic endeavors.
Similarly, these same structural factors pose a threat to the survival of ecosystems as
resources are extracted at a faster pace and shipped to all parts of the world for
consumption and processing (Foster 1999). In response to these structural changes on the
environment, environmentalists, over the course of several decades, have fought for
stricter environmental regulations with regards to extracting resources and dumping the
end waste (Foster 1999). In the Pacific Northwest, where the communities in this study
are located, the two have often been pitted against one another in the common slogan,
“jobs vs. owls” (Carroll 1995; Foster 1999). Referring to the spotted owl, who makes its
home in the old-growth part of the forest and requires a large hunting and breeding
ground, this phrase implies that one can either retain jobs at the environments expense or
preserve local ecosystems—but not both. In the past, the two were researched
exclusively. For example, environmentalists, such as the Sierra Club and Audubon
Society, focused on preserving ecosystems while ignoring the effects that new legislation
may have on the number and quality of jobs in the area (Foster 1999; Pellow 2002). On
the other hand, several community activists and sociologists focused on building
community economic development, while ignoring any impacts it may have on the
surrounding environment (e.g. see Summers 1986).
However, recently, several environmental sociologists and community sociologists
have begun to emphasize the importance of creating socially and environmentally


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.