All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Leaving Community College: Do Existing Models of College Dropout Apply to Community College Students?
Unformatted Document Text:  defined “junior colleges” of prior decades, today’s community colleges are complex organizations serving multiple functions that extend far beyond the traditional transfer function. In this paper, I accomplish two tasks: 1. I briefly address some of the problems with the limited amount of research that does exist regarding the relationship between community college enrollment and educational attainment, paying special attention to the inherent bias toward traditional, four-year college student models. 2. I analyze longitudinal data to test existing theories on two separate subsamples: four-year college students and community college students. These analyses demonstrate the extent to which existing theories of college departure, or “drop- out,” might apply differently to community college student populations when compared to four-year college students. Data NCES’s Beginning Postsecondary Student Longitudinal Study (BPS:90/94) is utilized for all data reported in the tables. The quantitative data chosen are particularly well suited for this topic. Unlike surveys that sample high school cohorts like HS&B, NELS:88, and NLS-72, the BPS survey includes a nationally representative sample of students who began their post-secondary education in 1989/90 and follows them up through 1994. How Different Are They? Age Comparisons The sampling design of BPS better captures the increasing age heterogeneity of the actual college-going population by including not only those students who go directly from high school to college, but also those GED recipients and older students who return to college later in life. In fact, over one third of all beginning college students delay their entry to college from high school. Such age variation and diversity of intentions and life circumstances is clearly not included very well in samples of high school cohorts. The problem is particularly acute in terms of capturing a

Authors: Deil-Amen, Regina.
first   previous   Page 2 of 26   next   last



background image
defined “junior colleges” of prior decades, today’s community colleges are complex organizations
serving multiple functions that extend far beyond the traditional transfer function.
In this paper, I accomplish two tasks:
1.
I briefly address some of the problems with the limited amount of research that
does exist regarding the relationship between community college enrollment and
educational attainment, paying special attention to the inherent bias toward
traditional, four-year college student models.
2.
I analyze longitudinal data to test existing theories on two separate subsamples:
four-year college students and community college students. These analyses
demonstrate the extent to which existing theories of college departure, or “drop-
out,” might apply differently to community college student populations when
compared to four-year college students.
Data
NCES’s Beginning Postsecondary Student Longitudinal Study (BPS:90/94) is utilized for all
data reported in the tables. The quantitative data chosen are particularly well suited for this topic.
Unlike surveys that sample high school cohorts like HS&B, NELS:88, and NLS-72, the BPS survey
includes a nationally representative sample of students who began their post-secondary education in
1989/90 and follows them up through 1994.
How Different Are They? Age Comparisons
The sampling design of BPS better captures the increasing age heterogeneity of the actual
college-going population by including not only those students who go directly from high school to
college, but also those GED recipients and older students who return to college later in life. In fact,
over one third of all beginning college students delay their entry to college from high school. Such
age variation and diversity of intentions and life circumstances is clearly not included very well in
samples of high school cohorts. The problem is particularly acute in terms of capturing a


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 26   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.