All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Relational Aggression: The Social Destruction of Self Narratives
Unformatted Document Text:  1 RELATIONAL AGGRESSION: THE SOCIAL DESTRUCTION OF SELF-NARRATIVES In keeping with ‘cultural wisdom’, studies of aggression in children have consistently documented higher rates of aggressive behavior in boys than in girls. Recently, however, a few dissenting voices have begun to suggest that these findings are the result of biases built into key defining elements within the research itself. In particular, authors such as Owens, Shute & Slee (2000); Rigby (1998); Lagerspetz et al (1998, 1993); Salmivalli, et al (1997, 1996); Crick & Grotpeter (1995); and Bjorkqvist et al (1992, 1992a) have argued that aggression has been conflated with overt physical acts, and that these behaviors do not adequately express aggressiveness in females. While they accept the standard definition of aggression as behavior specifically intended to hurt or harm others, they argue that children who aggress—children who attempt to inflict harm on their peers--do so in a variety of ways. Crick and Grotpeter suggest that children aggress in gender-specific ways, by aiming to thwart or damage goals specific to male or female peer groups. Since physical dominance is consistent with the values and goals important to boys, it is reasonable to define male aggression in terms of hitting, pushing, and threatening to beat up upon others. However, girls tend to value relationships, and much—if not all—social interaction is focused around friendships, allegiance and intimacy. Therefore, it stands to reason that “girls’ attempts to harm others would focus on relational issues and would include behaviors that are intended to significantly damage another child’s friendships or feelings of inclusion by the peer group.” (Crick & Grotpeter, p.711). Aggression on the part of girls (and increasingly, of boys) is expressed as social manipulation: behavior which aims to damage both peer relationships and social status. Sociologists need to broaden their studies of peer culture in order to productively explore the new forms of conflict which are being defined by this shift. In this paper I hope to begin that work by integrating the work of cognitive, developmental, and social psychologists within a sociological framework. While my primary concern is with the impact of relational aggression on internal self-narratives which emerge during pre- and adolescent

Authors: Martocci, Laura.
first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last



background image
1
RELATIONAL AGGRESSION:
THE SOCIAL DESTRUCTION OF SELF-NARRATIVES
In keeping with ‘cultural wisdom’, studies of aggression in children have consistently
documented higher rates of aggressive behavior in boys than in girls. Recently, however, a
few dissenting voices have begun to suggest that these findings are the result of biases built
into key defining elements within the research itself. In particular, authors such as Owens,
Shute & Slee (2000); Rigby (1998); Lagerspetz et al (1998, 1993); Salmivalli, et al (1997,
1996); Crick & Grotpeter (1995); and Bjorkqvist et al (1992, 1992a) have argued that
aggression has been conflated with overt physical acts, and that these behaviors do not
adequately express aggressiveness in females. While they accept the standard definition of
aggression as behavior specifically intended to hurt or harm others, they argue that children
who aggress—children who attempt to inflict harm on their peers--do so in a variety of
ways. Crick and Grotpeter suggest that children aggress in gender-specific ways, by aiming
to thwart or damage goals specific to male or female peer groups. Since physical
dominance is consistent with the values and goals important to boys, it is reasonable to
define male aggression in terms of hitting, pushing, and threatening to beat up upon others.
However, girls tend to value relationships, and much—if not all—social interaction is focused
around friendships, allegiance and intimacy. Therefore, it stands to reason that “girls’
attempts to harm others would focus on relational issues and would include behaviors that
are intended to significantly damage another child’s friendships or feelings of inclusion by
the peer group.” (Crick & Grotpeter, p.711). Aggression on the part of girls (and
increasingly, of boys) is expressed as social manipulation: behavior which aims to damage
both peer relationships and social status.
Sociologists need to broaden their studies of peer culture in order to productively
explore the new forms of conflict which are being defined by this shift. In this paper I hope
to begin that work by integrating the work of cognitive, developmental, and social
psychologists within a sociological framework. While my primary concern is with the impact
of relational aggression on internal self-narratives which emerge during pre- and adolescent


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.