 |
University Challenges: The Trilemma of Higher Education Policy in Advanced Industrial States
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
University Challenges
The Trilemma of Higher Education Policy in
Advanced Industrial States
Ben Ansell
Harvard University
This paper analyzes the politics of higher education policy in advanced industrial states, examining both partisan preferences over spending and three different institutional forms of higher education provision: the Anglo-American, Continental, and Scandinavian models. The paper applies the well-known ‘trilemma’ framework developed by Iversen and Wren (1998) to the area of higher education policy. I demonstrate that the logic of the trilemma can be extended to a three-way trade-off between the extent of coverage, the degree of subsidization, and the overall cost of higher education. The Anglo-American model leads to a mass, partially private, and publicly inexpensive system. The Continental model leads to an elite, fully public, and inexpensive system. Finally, the Scandinavian model leads to a mass, fully public, but highly expensive system. This set of choices facing both governments and voters is modeled formally and the derived trade-offs tested on a panel dataset of OECD states from 1990 to 2000. Three case studies, of the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany are then analyzed in greater detail to show the dynamic partisan trade-offs facing states as they expand higher education. The paper concludes by offering some suggestions about the long-term impact of these decisions on the likely success of newly-elected Continental right wing parties in achieving their education and labor market goals.
Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference
April 2006, Chicago
Please do not cite without author’s permission (## email not listed ##)
1
|
| |
| |
|
|
University Challenges
The Trilemma of Higher Education Policy in
Advanced Industrial States
Ben Ansell
Harvard University
This paper analyzes the politics of higher education policy in advanced industrial states,
examining both partisan preferences over spending and three different institutional forms
of higher education provision: the Anglo-American, Continental, and Scandinavian
models. The paper applies the well-known ‘trilemma’ framework developed by Iversen
and Wren (1998) to the area of higher education policy. I demonstrate that the logic of
the trilemma can be extended to a three-way trade-off between the extent of coverage, the
degree of subsidization, and the overall cost of higher education. The Anglo-American
model leads to a mass, partially private, and publicly inexpensive system. The
Continental model leads to an elite, fully public, and inexpensive system. Finally, the
Scandinavian model leads to a mass, fully public, but highly expensive system. This set
of choices facing both governments and voters is modeled formally and the derived trade-
offs tested on a panel dataset of OECD states from 1990 to 2000. Three case studies, of
the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Germany are then analyzed in greater detail to show
the dynamic partisan trade-offs facing states as they expand higher education. The paper
concludes by offering some suggestions about the long-term impact of these decisions on
the likely success of newly-elected Continental right wing parties in achieving their
education and labor market goals.
Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference
April 2006, Chicago
Please do not cite without author’s permission (## email not listed ##)
1
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 55 
