 |
Using an Evidence-Based Assessment System to Demonstrate Candidate Quality in a Preservice Teacher Education Program
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Using an Evidence Based Assessment System to Demonstrate Candidate Quality in a Pre service
Teacher Education Program
DescriptionDescribe the design and implementation of a standards-based assessment system that measures pre-service candidate quality through documented entries that require description, analysis, and reflection on teaching practice and student learning.
A. Statement of the Issue
Clearly, the accountability demanded of today’s teacher education programs has heightened the
awareness of the need to develop quality teachers to ensure the successful learning of a wide range of students. Over the past five years, a unit-wide goal for our School of Education has been to create a seamless assessment model that encompasses all aspects of a candidates’ career as a high-quality educator, while simultaneously demonstrating the quality and impact of a traditional teacher education program. This assessment system and its required processes and products reflects the essential aspects of an effective teacher education program.
The design of this assessment system has at its core “documented entries” which are grounded in
standards for both pre-service (state-based, INTASC) and in-service (NBPTS) teachers. The categories of Classrooms as Communities, Formal Learning and Assessment, and Planning for Powerful Learning embody the broad scope of best practice literature. Our question has focused on how to best prepare our candidates to meet the increasing demands of today’s classrooms, and how do we know they are prepared, and are ready, to meet these demands.
This system has allowed us to look beyond the confines of a teacher education program into the
first and second years of our candidates’ teaching lives to document their on-going development. Our question, now, begins to address how well-prepared our candidates are in their first years, and describing those qualities that make them prepared to meet the increasingly complex demands of teaching.
B. Literature review
Many scholars continue to confront the call for increased teacher accountability through standardized testing (Cochran-Smith, 2003a, 2003b; Darling-Hammond, 2002), suggesting that evidence-based and performance based assessment is a more fitting approach to assessing and evaluating the quality of teaching. A teacher’s impact on student learning is increasingly cited as the new hallmark of effectiveness (Washington Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, 2003). The profession continues to make the case for the use of performance based assessments in practice rather than traditional, paper/pencil standardized tests of knowledge. The following topics are relevant to grounding this work:
•
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) provides evidence of quality teaching through description, analysis, and reflection (access information at www.nbpts.org). This model has reinforced the notion of reflection as a critical ability in effective teaching; it has also reinforced the notion of “best practices” as effective in classrooms, further assisting in a move away from traditional, often ineffective, classroom practices (Diez & Blackwell, 1999). The NBPTS structure of providing performance based evidence of best practice, framed around a set of questions and descriptors, holds promise as an approach for teacher education.
•
The use of performance based assessments via portfolios is not new to teacher education (Bird, 1990; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000). However, enabling teacher candidates to both collect evidence of quality and reflect on their impact on student learning has remained variable across teacher education (Delandshere & Arens, 2003). For many, standards provide an opportunity for performance based assessment to become stronger and more focused (Darling-Hammond, Diez, Moss, Pecheone, Pullin, Shafer, & Vickers, 1998).
•
Reflection has long been seen as a critical factor for effective teaching practices (Schon, 1983). But, teaching reflection is, indeed, more difficult to teach and model than it might appear (reflecion/refraction article; Riskos, Vukelich, Roskos, 2002). Teacher educators are challenged to move beyond traditional teaching methods to assist teacher candidates in the development of their reflective skills and strategies.
•
What is quality in teaching? Currently, federal legislation encourages the thinking that quality in teaching can only be determined by standardized tests taken both by students and teachers.
|
| | Authors: Weiss, Jan. and Lewis, Jan. |
|
| |
|
|
Using an Evidence Based Assessment System to Demonstrate Candidate Quality in a Pre service
Teacher Education Program
Description Describe the design and implementation of a standards-based assessment system that measures pre-service candidate quality through documented entries that require description, analysis, and reflection on teaching practice and student learning.
A. Statement of the Issue
Clearly, the accountability demanded of today’s teacher education programs has heightened the
awareness of the need to develop quality teachers to ensure the successful learning of a wide range of students. Over the past five years, a unit-wide goal for our School of Education has been to create a seamless assessment model that encompasses all aspects of a candidates’ career as a high-quality educator, while simultaneously demonstrating the quality and impact of a traditional teacher education program. This assessment system and its required processes and products reflects the essential aspects of an effective teacher education program.
The design of this assessment system has at its core “documented entries” which are grounded in
standards for both pre-service (state-based, INTASC) and in-service (NBPTS) teachers. The categories of Classrooms as Communities, Formal Learning and Assessment, and Planning for Powerful Learning embody the broad scope of best practice literature. Our question has focused on how to best prepare our candidates to meet the increasing demands of today’s classrooms, and how do we know they are prepared, and are ready, to meet these demands.
This system has allowed us to look beyond the confines of a teacher education program into the
first and second years of our candidates’ teaching lives to document their on-going development. Our question, now, begins to address how well-prepared our candidates are in their first years, and describing those qualities that make them prepared to meet the increasingly complex demands of teaching.
B. Literature review
Many scholars continue to confront the call for increased teacher accountability through standardized testing (Cochran-Smith, 2003a, 2003b; Darling-Hammond, 2002), suggesting that evidence-based and performance based assessment is a more fitting approach to assessing and evaluating the quality of teaching. A teacher’s impact on student learning is increasingly cited as the new hallmark of effectiveness (Washington Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, 2003). The profession continues to make the case for the use of performance based assessments in practice rather than traditional, paper/pencil standardized tests of knowledge. The following topics are relevant to grounding this work:
•
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) provides evidence of quality teaching through description, analysis, and reflection (access information at www.nbpts.org). This model has reinforced the notion of reflection as a critical ability in effective teaching; it has also reinforced the notion of “best practices” as effective in classrooms, further assisting in a move away from traditional, often ineffective, classroom practices (Diez & Blackwell, 1999). The NBPTS structure of providing performance based evidence of best practice, framed around a set of questions and descriptors, holds promise as an approach for teacher education.
•
The use of performance based assessments via portfolios is not new to teacher education (Bird, 1990; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000). However, enabling teacher candidates to both collect evidence of quality and reflect on their impact on student learning has remained variable across teacher education (Delandshere & Arens, 2003). For many, standards provide an opportunity for performance based assessment to become stronger and more focused (Darling-Hammond, Diez, Moss, Pecheone, Pullin, Shafer, & Vickers, 1998).
•
Reflection has long been seen as a critical factor for effective teaching practices (Schon, 1983). But, teaching reflection is, indeed, more difficult to teach and model than it might appear (reflecion/refraction article; Riskos, Vukelich, Roskos, 2002). Teacher educators are challenged to move beyond traditional teaching methods to assist teacher candidates in the development of their reflective skills and strategies.
•
What is quality in teaching? Currently, federal legislation encourages the thinking that quality in teaching can only be determined by standardized tests taken both by students and teachers.
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|