 |
Using Web-Based Technology to Effectively and Efficiently Place and Evaluate Student Teachers, Supervisors and Programs
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Using Web-Based Technology to Effectively and Efficiently Place and Evaluate Student
Teachers, Supervisors and Programs
Section I: ContentA. Statement of the issue: The new technologies also allow education programs to more efficiently place and evaluate student teachers, supervisors and programs. This paper will describe the issues and factors to be considered in deciding whether and how to implement web-based systems for placement and evaluation such as programming, computer support, web access, institutional support (administration, faculty and staff), internal and external reporting of data, buy-in by all constituencies involved and compatibility.
Teacher education programs are increasingly required or expected to supply data that supports their contentions that their programs are effective in producing teachers who have the knowledge, skills and dispositions needed to be successful teachers. One important source of such data is evaluation of the student teachers by their classroom supervisors, university supervisors and themselves. How can we effectively and efficiently obtain data from all of these sources in ways that can be easily interpreted and analyzed across several variables? This paper will present the knowledge learned from one mid-sized state university’s experience in successfully answering this question over the last four years.
The School of Education Field Experience Office has placed all evaluation forms related to student teaching online. These forms are filled out by the evaluators and the entered data is used to make grading, programming, processing and accreditation decisions. All student teachers (about 100 a semester) all supervising teachers (about 150 a semester) and all university supervisors (about 25 a semester) complete 1-3 evaluation forms online. These student teaching evaluations forms include the First Progress Report, Mid-Term Evaluation, Final Evaluation by Supervising Teacher, Final Evaluation by Student Teacher, Final Evaluation by University Supervisor, Evaluation of the Student Teaching Program by Supervising Teachers and Student Teachers, Evaluation of the University Supervisor by Student Teachers and Supervising Teachers and Evaluation of the Supervising Teacher by the Student Teacher and the University Supervisor.
The online student teaching application process makes data accessible to the parties that need it in a timely manner, decreased the amount of work and provided needed records for follow up. For example, we created three separate systems that work to manage student teacher information. These systems are a teaching application, a system to manage active teaching assignments, and a system to receive and manage the state certification applications. There are also a number of minor systems that allow for the interaction of third parties with this data.
The first system, the student teaching application, allows a student to enter all the information necessary to request a student teaching placement through the School of Education. This system begins with the entry of the candidates available data from university programs already inserted into the applications, such as address and majors. The students then confirm or correct the data which is part of the existing university record and then enter the remaining data needed to complete the application. The administration side of the system allows the School of Education to then take these applications and assign them to various K-12 schools around the region, and as
|
| | Authors: Clarken, Rodney. |
|
| |
|
|
Using Web-Based Technology to Effectively and Efficiently Place and Evaluate Student
Teachers, Supervisors and Programs
Section I: Content A. Statement of the issue: The new technologies also allow education programs to more efficiently place and evaluate student teachers, supervisors and programs. This paper will describe the issues and factors to be considered in deciding whether and how to implement web-based systems for placement and evaluation such as programming, computer support, web access, institutional support (administration, faculty and staff), internal and external reporting of data, buy-in by all constituencies involved and compatibility.
Teacher education programs are increasingly required or expected to supply data that supports their contentions that their programs are effective in producing teachers who have the knowledge, skills and dispositions needed to be successful teachers. One important source of such data is evaluation of the student teachers by their classroom supervisors, university supervisors and themselves. How can we effectively and efficiently obtain data from all of these sources in ways that can be easily interpreted and analyzed across several variables? This paper will present the knowledge learned from one mid-sized state university’s experience in successfully answering this question over the last four years.
The School of Education Field Experience Office has placed all evaluation forms related to student teaching online. These forms are filled out by the evaluators and the entered data is used to make grading, programming, processing and accreditation decisions. All student teachers (about 100 a semester) all supervising teachers (about 150 a semester) and all university supervisors (about 25 a semester) complete 1-3 evaluation forms online. These student teaching evaluations forms include the First Progress Report, Mid-Term Evaluation, Final Evaluation by Supervising Teacher, Final Evaluation by Student Teacher, Final Evaluation by University Supervisor, Evaluation of the Student Teaching Program by Supervising Teachers and Student Teachers, Evaluation of the University Supervisor by Student Teachers and Supervising Teachers and Evaluation of the Supervising Teacher by the Student Teacher and the University Supervisor.
The online student teaching application process makes data accessible to the parties that need it in a timely manner, decreased the amount of work and provided needed records for follow up. For example, we created three separate systems that work to manage student teacher information. These systems are a teaching application, a system to manage active teaching assignments, and a system to receive and manage the state certification applications. There are also a number of minor systems that allow for the interaction of third parties with this data.
The first system, the student teaching application, allows a student to enter all the information necessary to request a student teaching placement through the School of Education. This system begins with the entry of the candidates available data from university programs already inserted into the applications, such as address and majors. The students then confirm or correct the data which is part of the existing university record and then enter the remaining data needed to complete the application. The administration side of the system allows the School of Education to then take these applications and assign them to various K-12 schools around the region, and as
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|