 |
Philosophy of Science and Scholarship in Political Economy: The Scientific Realist Critique of The Scientific Status of “The Economic Approach to Politics”
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Philosophy of Science and Scholarship in Political Economy:
The Scientific Realist Critique of
The Scientific Status of
“The Economic Approach to Politics”
Abstract
:
The growth in influence of the “economic approach to politics”
within Political Science and International Relations is
based on the conventionally accepted view that neoclassical economics is “the most scientific of the social sciences.” However, neoclassical economics have long been criticized for building and employing theories whose core components (assumptions, premises, postulates, axioms, etc) are readily accepted as unrealistic or false. The unrealistic nature of these central components has traditionally been defended through the deployment of instrumentalism, which itself is based in a positivist understanding of science. Drawing upon the scientific realist and critical realist critique of positivism, this paper constructs a realist critique of instrumentalism and its use in defending the scientific status neoclassical social theories. It will be shown that instrumentalism is not scientifically defensible from a realist point of view and that there has been considerable criticism of the continued use of instrumentalism to defend the practices of scholars who employ neoclassical economics as a scientific approach to social phenomena. Noting that these criticisms have not had a major impact on the practices of scholars employing the neoclassical approach, the paper turns to a critical realist explanation for this negligible impact, focusing on the larger social structures that help to generate and shape the production of “scientific” knowledge. The paper ends with a discussion of the relationship between the positivist notion of value-neutral/objective science and the role that scholars play in reinforcing and reproducing larger societal structures through the kinds of social theories they employ. The paper argues that the growing realist critique of the neoclassical approach should be taken more seriously within IR and Political Science.
Jorge Rivas Department of Political Science University of Minnesota ## email not listed ## Paper prepared for the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association 28 February to 4 March 2007 Chicago, IL, USA Working Paper: Please do not cite without author’s permission. Please email the author for an updated version of this paper. Comments extremely welcome.
I wish to thank Colin Wight, Jonathan Joseph, David Leon, Fred Chernoff, Kathryn Sikkink, August Nimtz, Bud Duvall, and Chris Isett, for their helpful comments on earlier versions or related aspects of this work.
|
| |
| |
|
|
Philosophy of Science and Scholarship in Political Economy:
The Scientific Realist Critique of
The Scientific Status of
“The Economic Approach to Politics”
Abstract
:
The growth in influence of the “economic approach to politics”
within Political Science and International Relations is
based on the conventionally accepted view that neoclassical economics is “the most scientific of the social sciences.”
However, neoclassical economics have long been criticized for building and employing theories whose core components
(assumptions, premises, postulates, axioms, etc) are readily accepted as unrealistic or false. The unrealistic nature of
these central components has traditionally been defended through the deployment of instrumentalism, which itself is
based in a positivist understanding of science. Drawing upon the scientific realist and critical realist critique of positivism,
this paper constructs a realist critique of instrumentalism and its use in defending the scientific status neoclassical social
theories. It will be shown that instrumentalism is not scientifically defensible from a realist point of view and that there
has been considerable criticism of the continued use of instrumentalism to defend the practices of scholars who employ
neoclassical economics as a scientific approach to social phenomena. Noting that these criticisms have not had a major
impact on the practices of scholars employing the neoclassical approach, the paper turns to a critical realist explanation
for this negligible impact, focusing on the larger social structures that help to generate and shape the production of
“scientific” knowledge. The paper ends with a discussion of the relationship between the positivist notion of value-
neutral/objective science and the role that scholars play in reinforcing and reproducing larger societal structures through
the kinds of social theories they employ. The paper argues that the growing realist critique of the neoclassical approach
should be taken more seriously within IR and Political Science.
Jorge Rivas
Department of Political Science
University of Minnesota
## email not listed ##
Paper prepared for the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association
28 February to 4 March 2007 Chicago, IL, USA
Working Paper: Please do not cite without author’s permission. Please email the author for an
updated version of this paper. Comments extremely welcome.
I wish to thank Colin Wight, Jonathan Joseph, David Leon, Fred Chernoff, Kathryn Sikkink, August Nimtz, Bud Duvall,
and Chris Isett, for their helpful comments on earlier versions or related aspects of this work.
|
|
 Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 31 
