All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

The Impact of Marital Status and Social Support on Psychological Distress among African American Women
Unformatted Document Text:  © January 2007, Patrice L. Dickerson Page 1 The Impact of Marital Status and Social Support on Psychological Distress Among African American Women Patrice L. Dickerson College of Social & Behavioral Sciences The Ohio State University ABSTRACT: The health effects of marriage are well documented and the research consistently shows that marriage positively affects mental and physical health. Unmarried persons are considered to have worse health than married persons because they lack the social and financial resources to which married persons have access. Although the relationship between marriage, social support, and health has been strongly established, this should not suggest that the unmarried lack access to social support systems and are doomed to ill health. Using data from the National Survey of Black Americans, this study examines the nature of the relationships between marital status, social support and psychological well-being. The findings suggest that marriage is not as beneficial to psychological well-being as previous studies have suggested, at least not for Black women. Although married women are less distressed than divorced or separated women, they are actually more distressed than widowed or never-married women. Married women do, however, have access to more social support. Yet, the spousal support married women receive is not associated with their mental health. Although spousal support did not protect married women from psychological distress, I did find that certain types of social support are associated with higher levels of distress. INTRODUCTION The health effects of marriage are well documented and the research consistently shows that marriage positively affects mental and physical health. Marriage provides security and a network of help and support, which can be particularly beneficial in dealing with stress and in recovering from illnesses (Waite, 1995). Unmarried persons are considered to have worse health than married persons because they lack the social and financial resources to which married persons have access. Although the relationship between marriage, social support, and health has been strongly established, this should not suggest that the non-married have no access to social support systems and are therefore doomed to constantly be plagued by ill health. Instead, the non-married may develop patterns of social support different from those used by individuals in other marital statuses (Barrett, 1999). In fact, it has been found that the social support systems of the non-married differ from those of the married. This suggests that the non-married do not lack social support completely, but have access to different types of social support than the married. Individuals who live alone may compensate for the lack of social interaction within the home through greater social interaction with friends and relatives; greater attendance at church, concerts, and movies; and more volunteerism (Rogers, 1996), all of which could be protective of health. Also, it is no longer considered deviant to remain unmarried (Cherlin, 1992). Unmarried persons can engage in activities formerly reserved for the married (such as sexual relations and living together) without fear of stigmatization (Glenn & Weaver, 1988). Changing trends in marital behavior, specifically declining marriage rates, may diminish the association between marital status and health. It is likely that as single life becomes more common and accepted it may also become less disadvantaged and therefore may be less associated with poor health (Marks, 1996; Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1998). It can be assumed that as non-marriage becomes more normative, individuals may become more resilient and therefore may not be as vulnerable to the disadvantages associated with non-marriage in the past. Similarly, knowing that they will lack the support of a spouse, unmarried individuals may

Authors: Dickerson, Patrice.
first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last



background image
© January 2007, Patrice L. Dickerson
Page 1
The Impact of Marital Status and Social Support on
Psychological Distress Among African American Women
Patrice L. Dickerson
College of Social & Behavioral Sciences
The Ohio State University

ABSTRACT: The health effects of marriage are well documented and the research consistently shows that
marriage positively affects mental and physical health. Unmarried persons are considered to have worse health than
married persons because they lack the social and financial resources to which married persons have access.
Although the relationship between marriage, social support, and health has been strongly established, this should not
suggest that the unmarried lack access to social support systems and are doomed to ill health. Using data from the
National Survey of Black Americans, this study examines the nature of the relationships between marital status,
social support and psychological well-being. The findings suggest that marriage is not as beneficial to psychological
well-being as previous studies have suggested, at least not for Black women. Although married women are less
distressed than divorced or separated women, they are actually more distressed than widowed or never-married
women. Married women do, however, have access to more social support. Yet, the spousal support married women
receive is not associated with their mental health. Although spousal support did not protect married women from
psychological distress, I did find that certain types of social support are associated with higher levels of distress.
INTRODUCTION
The health effects of marriage are well documented and the research consistently shows that marriage
positively affects mental and physical health. Marriage provides security and a network of help and support, which
can be particularly beneficial in dealing with stress and in recovering from illnesses (Waite, 1995). Unmarried
persons are considered to have worse health than married persons because they lack the social and financial
resources to which married persons have access.
Although the relationship between marriage, social support, and health has been strongly established, this
should not suggest that the non-married have no access to social support systems and are therefore doomed to
constantly be plagued by ill health. Instead, the non-married may develop patterns of social support different from
those used by individuals in other marital statuses (Barrett, 1999). In fact, it has been found that the social support
systems of the non-married differ from those of the married. This suggests that the non-married do not lack social
support completely, but have access to different types of social support than the married. Individuals who live alone
may compensate for the lack of social interaction within the home through greater social interaction with friends and
relatives; greater attendance at church, concerts, and movies; and more volunteerism (Rogers, 1996), all of which
could be protective of health.
Also, it is no longer considered deviant to remain unmarried (Cherlin, 1992). Unmarried persons can
engage in activities formerly reserved for the married (such as sexual relations and living together) without fear of
stigmatization (Glenn & Weaver, 1988). Changing trends in marital behavior, specifically declining marriage rates,
may diminish the association between marital status and health. It is likely that as single life becomes more
common and accepted it may also become less disadvantaged and therefore may be less associated with poor health
(Marks, 1996; Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1998). It can be assumed that as non-marriage becomes more normative,
individuals may become more resilient and therefore may not be as vulnerable to the disadvantages associated with
non-marriage in the past. Similarly, knowing that they will lack the support of a spouse, unmarried individuals may


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.