 |
Mathematics of College Algebra Students: The Interplay between Students’ Self-Efficacy and Formal Mathematical Beliefs
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
156
MATHEMATICS OF COLLEGE ALGEBRA STUDENTS: THE
INTERPLAY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SELF-EFFICACY
AND FORMAL MATHEMATICAL BELIEFS
Victor V. Cifarelli
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
## email not listed ##
Tracy Goodson-Espy
Appalachian State University
## email not listed ##
This paper reports the results of a study of the beliefs of College Algebra students. Subjects (N=195) came from College Algebra classes at two universities in the southern United States. Data sources included a mathematical beliefs survey instrument and on-going individual interviews conducted with 30 of the students. We address two types of mathematical beliefs, formal mathematical and self-efficacy beliefs, and focus on the inter-connections of these as students solve mathematics problems. Of particular interest is how the students' knowledge of formal mathematical concepts co-exists with their efficacy beliefs in the course of on-going mathematical activity. Drawing from episodes of interviews with one student, the analysis explains the complexity of the students’ mathematical beliefs and how these impact the solvers’ on-going problem solving actions.
There is growing consensus that the traditional College Algebra (CA) course is not helping
students become quantitatively literate citizens (Hastings, 2006). Based on long-term demographic studies, high D/F/W course rates and the failure of CA to provide students with applicable skills, the Conference to Improve College Algebra has called for revamping the CA course (Small, 2002). Other research conducted on CA students surveyed their mathematical beliefs (Frank, 1986), documented their often fragmented conceptual understandings (Carlson, 1997), and examined the effectiveness of instructional strategies (Underwood-Gregg and Yackel, 2000). However, few studies examined how mathematical beliefs influence the ways students interpret and solve mathematics problems. More needs to be known about how beliefs influence students’ initiative and efficacy in problem solving.
Purpose and Theory
Our goal is to improve our understanding of the interactions between a student’s
mathematical beliefs and his/her problem solving actions so that we can develop effective intervention strategies. Drawing from the work of Cooney, Shealy, and Arvold (1998), we view the learner’s mathematical beliefs as complex mental structures that aid his/her interpretations in mathematical situations. Muis (2004) noted that previous research employed either a qualitative approach, observing students’ problem solving, or a quantitative approach, using students’ self-reported survey responses. Studies employing either methodology found significant relationships between students’ mathematical beliefs, their engagement with mathematical tasks, and achievement. Muis recommended that further studies employ both qualitative and quantitative analyses in order to develop a more robust understanding of interactions among beliefs, learning, and achievement. Our study included surveys and repeated observations of students solving problems. This is compatible with Vergnaud’s (1984) notion that solvers demonstrate their conceptions as “mathematical beliefs-in-action” as they solve problems, and that beliefs serve as conceptual models where solution activity may develop (Vergnaud, 1984, p.7). Often, CA students are viewed as lacking both formal conceptual knowledge and self-efficacy in their actions. We believe this is not the case; the
Lamberg, T., & Wiest, L. R. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the 29
th
annual meeting of the North
American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
|
| | Authors: Cifarelli, Victor. and Goodson-Espy, Tracy. |
|
| |
|
|
156
MATHEMATICS OF COLLEGE ALGEBRA STUDENTS: THE
INTERPLAY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SELF-EFFICACY
AND FORMAL MATHEMATICAL BELIEFS
Victor V. Cifarelli
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Tracy Goodson-Espy
Appalachian State University
This paper reports the results of a study of the beliefs of College Algebra students. Subjects (N=195) came from College Algebra classes at two universities in the southern United States. Data sources included a mathematical beliefs survey instrument and on-going individual interviews conducted with 30 of the students. We address two types of mathematical beliefs, formal mathematical and self-efficacy beliefs, and focus on the inter-connections of these as students solve mathematics problems. Of particular interest is how the students' knowledge of formal mathematical concepts co-exists with their efficacy beliefs in the course of on-going mathematical activity. Drawing from episodes of interviews with one student, the analysis explains the complexity of the students’ mathematical beliefs and how these impact the solvers’ on-going problem solving actions.
There is growing consensus that the traditional College Algebra (CA) course is not helping
students become quantitatively literate citizens (Hastings, 2006). Based on long-term demographic studies, high D/F/W course rates and the failure of CA to provide students with applicable skills, the Conference to Improve College Algebra has called for revamping the CA course (Small, 2002). Other research conducted on CA students surveyed their mathematical beliefs (Frank, 1986), documented their often fragmented conceptual understandings (Carlson, 1997), and examined the effectiveness of instructional strategies (Underwood-Gregg and Yackel, 2000). However, few studies examined how mathematical beliefs influence the ways students interpret and solve mathematics problems. More needs to be known about how beliefs influence students’ initiative and efficacy in problem solving.
Purpose and Theory
Our goal is to improve our understanding of the interactions between a student’s
mathematical beliefs and his/her problem solving actions so that we can develop effective intervention strategies. Drawing from the work of Cooney, Shealy, and Arvold (1998), we view the learner’s mathematical beliefs as complex mental structures that aid his/her interpretations in mathematical situations. Muis (2004) noted that previous research employed either a qualitative approach, observing students’ problem solving, or a quantitative approach, using students’ self-reported survey responses. Studies employing either methodology found significant relationships between students’ mathematical beliefs, their engagement with mathematical tasks, and achievement. Muis recommended that further studies employ both qualitative and quantitative analyses in order to develop a more robust understanding of interactions among beliefs, learning, and achievement. Our study included surveys and repeated observations of students solving problems. This is compatible with Vergnaud’s (1984) notion that solvers demonstrate their conceptions as “mathematical beliefs-in-action” as they solve problems, and that beliefs serve as conceptual models where solution activity may develop (Vergnaud, 1984, p.7). Often, CA students are viewed as lacking both formal conceptual knowledge and self-efficacy in their actions. We believe this is not the case; the
Lamberg, T., & Wiest, L. R. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the 29
th
annual meeting of the North
American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|