 |
English Language Learners: Developing Mathematical Understanding
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
162
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS:
DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING
Jo Clay Olson
Washington State U
## email not listed ##
Karmin Braun
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Meghan Colasanti
Aurora Public School
meghan.## email not listed ##
Karla Groth
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Bruce Wilcox
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Today mathematics reform efforts face the challenge of raising the performance levels of
students and are forced to examine how to accomplish this within growing culturally and linguistically diverse populations (Grant & Lei, 2002; Gebhard, 2002). Analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) indicated that English language learners (ELLs) do not achieve at the same level as their English speaking counterparts . In 2005, 71% of the non-ELL eighth-grade students were at the basic level or above compared to only 29% of the ELL eighth-grade students who were at the basic level or above. The report documents that both ELL and non-ELL student mathematics achievement has slowly increased since 1996 and the achievement gap between ELLs and non-ELLs was slightly reduced. But, with only 6% of the ELL eighth-grade students reaching proficiency, inequities are significant.
Cocking and Mestre (1988) suggested that the language used to describe mathematical ideas in
English has specific interpretations and is problematic for students with limited understanding of English. Thus, achievement gap may not be due solely to difficulties with math concepts or to second language acquisition but to a complex interaction of the two. Students interpret math related words and symbols based on previously constructed understanding. When students are also learning English, the process of acquiring new mathematical understanding is mediated through two sets of meanings developed in their native tongue and English. Translation alone, without attention to prior knowledge of math concepts is not effective. Helping students who are ELLs develop a rich understanding of mathematics is challenging because everyday and abstract ideas may have been internalized in one or the other language, based on individual experiences. Therefore it is extremely difficult for teachers to identify the prior knowledge upon which they should build.
This research report is part of a longitudinal study that examines the how ELLs assimilate
mathematical understanding while acquiring English language skills. The purpose of this report is to describe the mathematical ideas that fourth- and fifth-grade ELLs understood after using Investigations in Number, Data, and Space .
Theoretical Framework
Theorists (e.g., Cobb, Wood, & Yackel, 1970; Kumpulainen & Mutanen, 2000) suggests that
social activities influence the learning of mathematics as individuals negotiate meaning through interactions. From the perspective of symbolic interactionism (Blumer, 1969), an individual interprets another person’s words and gestures to create meaning. Shared meanings are constructed through a dynamic process of creating and re-creating meanings as individuals interact with each other. People attach particular meanings to words, symbols, and gestures through these social
Lamberg, T., & Wiest, L. R. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the 29
th
annual meeting of the North
American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno
|
| | Authors: Olson, Jo., Braun, Karmin., Colasanti, Meghan., Groth, Karla. and Wilcox, Bruce. |
|
| |
|
|
162
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS:
DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING
Jo Clay Olson
Washington State U
## email not listed ##
Karmin Braun
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Meghan Colasanti
Aurora Public School
meghan.## email not listed ##
Karla Groth
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Bruce Wilcox
Aurora Public School
## email not listed ##
Today mathematics reform efforts face the challenge of raising the performance levels of
students and are forced to examine how to accomplish this within growing culturally and linguistically diverse populations (Grant & Lei, 2002; Gebhard, 2002). Analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) indicated that English language learners (ELLs) do not achieve at the same level as their English speaking counterparts . In 2005, 71% of the non-ELL eighth-grade students were at the basic level or above compared to only 29% of the ELL eighth- grade students who were at the basic level or above. The report documents that both ELL and non- ELL student mathematics achievement has slowly increased since 1996 and the achievement gap between ELLs and non-ELLs was slightly reduced. But, with only 6% of the ELL eighth-grade students reaching proficiency, inequities are significant.
Cocking and Mestre (1988) suggested that the language used to describe mathematical ideas in
English has specific interpretations and is problematic for students with limited understanding of English. Thus, achievement gap may not be due solely to difficulties with math concepts or to second language acquisition but to a complex interaction of the two. Students interpret math related words and symbols based on previously constructed understanding. When students are also learning English, the process of acquiring new mathematical understanding is mediated through two sets of meanings developed in their native tongue and English. Translation alone, without attention to prior knowledge of math concepts is not effective. Helping students who are ELLs develop a rich understanding of mathematics is challenging because everyday and abstract ideas may have been internalized in one or the other language, based on individual experiences. Therefore it is extremely difficult for teachers to identify the prior knowledge upon which they should build.
This research report is part of a longitudinal study that examines the how ELLs assimilate
mathematical understanding while acquiring English language skills. The purpose of this report is to describe the mathematical ideas that fourth- and fifth-grade ELLs understood after using Investigations in Number, Data, and Space .
Theoretical Framework
Theorists (e.g., Cobb, Wood, & Yackel, 1970; Kumpulainen & Mutanen, 2000) suggests that
social activities influence the learning of mathematics as individuals negotiate meaning through interactions. From the perspective of symbolic interactionism (Blumer, 1969), an individual interprets another person’s words and gestures to create meaning. Shared meanings are constructed through a dynamic process of creating and re-creating meanings as individuals interact with each other. People attach particular meanings to words, symbols, and gestures through these social
Lamberg, T., & Wiest, L. R. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the 29
th
annual meeting of the North
American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|