 |
Crashing the Gatekeepers: The Newsworthiness of Political News Online
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American
Political Discourse
Scholars of political communication have long examined newsworthiness by focusing on the “gatekeepers,” or organizations involved in newsgathering (Lewin 1947, White 1950, Sigal 1973, Gans 1979). However, in recent years these gatekeeper organizations have increasingly been joined or even supplanted by “new media” competitors, including cable news, talk radio, and even amateur bloggers. The standards by which this new class of gatekeepers evaluates news are at best partially explained by prior studies focused on “professional” journalists. In this study, we seek to correct this oversight. We do so by content analyzing five online news sources – including wire service, cable news, and blog sites – in order to compare their gatekeeping decisions in the four months prior, and approximately three weeks immediately following, the 2006 midterm election. To determine each day’s major political news, we collected all stories from Reuters’ and AP’s “Top Political News” sections. We then investigated whether a given story was also chosen to appear on each wire’s Top News page (indicating greater perceived newsworthiness than those that were not chosen) and compare the wires’ editorial choices to those of more partisan blogs (from the left: DailyKos.com, and from the right: FreeRepublic.com) and cable outlets (FoxNews.com). We find evidence of greater partisan filtering on the latter three web sources, and relatively greater reliance on traditional newsworthiness criteria on the news wires.
Matthew A. Baum
Harvard University
John F. Kennedy School of Government
(on leave from UCLA)
## email not listed ##
Tim Groeling
University of California, Los Angeles
## email not listed ##
Paper prepared for presentation at the 2007 meeting of the American Political Science
Association, Chicago, IL, August 30-September 2.
|
| | Authors: Groeling, Tim. and Baum, Matthew. |
|
| |
|
|
Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American
Political Discourse
Scholars of political communication have long examined newsworthiness by focusing on the
“gatekeepers,” or organizations involved in newsgathering (Lewin 1947, White 1950, Sigal
1973, Gans 1979). However, in recent years these gatekeeper organizations have increasingly
been joined or even supplanted by “new media” competitors, including cable news, talk radio,
and even amateur bloggers. The standards by which this new class of gatekeepers evaluates news
are at best partially explained by prior studies focused on “professional” journalists. In this study,
we seek to correct this oversight. We do so by content analyzing five online news sources –
including wire service, cable news, and blog sites – in order to compare their gatekeeping
decisions in the four months prior, and approximately three weeks immediately following, the
2006 midterm election. To determine each day’s major political news, we collected all stories
from Reuters’ and AP’s “Top Political News” sections. We then investigated whether a given
story was also chosen to appear on each wire’s Top News page (indicating greater perceived
newsworthiness than those that were not chosen) and compare the wires’ editorial choices to
those of more partisan blogs (from the left: DailyKos.com, and from the right:
FreeRepublic.com) and cable outlets (FoxNews.com). We find evidence of greater partisan
filtering on the latter three web sources, and relatively greater reliance on traditional
newsworthiness criteria on the news wires.
Matthew A. Baum
Harvard University
John F. Kennedy School of Government
(on leave from UCLA)
## email not listed ##
Tim Groeling
University of California, Los Angeles
## email not listed ##
Paper prepared for presentation at the 2007 meeting of the American Political Science
Association, Chicago, IL, August 30-September 2.
|
|
 Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 41 
