 |
Issue Framing, Political Parties, and Individual Differences
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Issue Framing, Political Parties, and Individual Differences
Rune Slothuus
Department of Political Science
University of Aarhus
Universitetsparken, Bldg. 1331
DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark
E-mail:
## email not listed ##
Web:
http://au.## email not listed ##
(Please direct correspondence to Slothuus)
Claes de Vreese
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
University of Amsterdam
Kloveniersburgwal 48
1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
E-mail:
c.h.## email not listed ##
Web:
www.claesdevreese.com
Preliminary draft: August 24, 2007 Comments are most welcome.
Abstract
Issue framing prevails in politics as one of the most important means of elite influence on public opinion. While research on issue framing effects has matured and illuminated the conditionality of framing effects, we still have a very limited knowledge of how citizens respond to issue frames in the common situation in politics where issue frames are sponsored by visible political groups. We investigate effects of frames explicitly sponsored by a political party. Based on two survey experiments with a nationally representative sample (N = 1,618), we find that framing effects are highly dependent on a match between party sponsor and receivers’ party attachments. Political parties can exert strong influence on opinion among their supporters while they face larger constraints in influencing out-partisans. Furthermore, we find party framing effects to be moderated by receivers’ political awareness with the most politically aware being most sensitive to who promotes the frame. Prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30 – September 2, 2007.
|
| | Authors: Slothuus, Rune. and de Vreese, Claes. |
|
| |
|
|
Issue Framing, Political Parties, and Individual Differences
Rune Slothuus
Department of Political Science
University of Aarhus
Universitetsparken, Bldg. 1331
DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark
E-mail:
## email not listed ##
Web:
http://au.## email not listed ##
(Please direct correspondence to Slothuus)
Claes de Vreese
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
University of Amsterdam
Kloveniersburgwal 48
1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
E-mail:
c.h.## email not listed ##
Web:
www.claesdevreese.com
Preliminary draft: August 24, 2007 Comments are most welcome.
Abstract
Issue framing prevails in politics as one of the most important means of elite influence on public opinion. While research on issue framing effects has matured and illuminated the conditionality of framing effects, we still have a very limited knowledge of how citizens respond to issue frames in the common situation in politics where issue frames are sponsored by visible political groups. We investigate effects of frames explicitly sponsored by a political party. Based on two survey experiments with a nationally representative sample (N = 1,618), we find that framing effects are highly dependent on a match between party sponsor and receivers’ party attachments. Political parties can exert strong influence on opinion among their supporters while they face larger constraints in influencing out-partisans. Furthermore, we find party framing effects to be moderated by receivers’ political awareness with the most politically aware being most sensitive to who promotes the frame. Prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30 – September 2, 2007.
|
|
Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|