All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Geographic Distance and Communication During Courtship: Examining Knowledge-Enhancing Talk
Unformatted Document Text:  Communication and Courtship situational constraints, researchers have yet to test this claim. This leads to our first hypothesis:  individuals in LDDRs (relative to those in GCDRs) will report talk characterized by a  significantly greater focus on intimacy (Hypothesis 1). To test this hypothesis, we explore  everyday speech events (Goldsmith & Baxter, 1996), which are described in greater detail later.  Implicit in hypothesis 1 are two predictions. First, it is predicted LDDR partners will  report a higher mean score for intimacy-related speech events than will GCDR partners. Second,  it is predicted that within LDDRs a trend will emerge wherein intimacy-related speech events are  the most commonly-reported form of speech events in partners’ everyday talk. Within GCDRs,  in contrast, it is expected that partners’ talk will be more balanced between intimate and non- intimate speech events. Other aspects of communication potentially influenced by the situational constraints of  geographic separation are conflict and taboo topic avoidance. In general, as relationships become  more interdependent, partners should be motivated to obtain information about their partner to  determine the appropriateness of their mate selection (Morton & Douglas, 1981; Surra &  Hughes, 1997). Although relational length is a strong predictor of later marital stability, it is not  the length of dating, per se, that is most important, but rather the partner knowledge acquired  during that time (Huston, 1994). That is, one’s understanding of one’s partner’s likes and dislikes  and personality characteristics occurs through accumulated everyday talk (Duck, 1994).  Consistent with this view, premarital counselors advise couples who have known each other a  short period of time to delay marriage to allow for increased deliberation about their readiness  and compatibility (Holman, Larson, & Harmer, 1994; Stanley, 2001).  Perhaps indicative of dating partners’ desire to learn about their partners throughout  courtship, research based on geographically-proximal dating couples has found that conflict and  6

Authors: Stafford, Laura. and Merolla, Andy.
first   previous   Page 6 of 37   next   last



background image
Communication and Courtship
situational constraints, researchers have yet to test this claim. This leads to our first hypothesis: 
individuals in LDDRs (relative to those in GCDRs) will report talk characterized by a 
significantly greater focus on intimacy (Hypothesis 1). To test this hypothesis, we explore 
everyday speech events (Goldsmith & Baxter, 1996), which are described in greater detail later. 
Implicit in hypothesis 1 are two predictions. First, it is predicted LDDR partners will 
report a higher mean score for intimacy-related speech events than will GCDR partners. Second, 
it is predicted that within LDDRs a trend will emerge wherein intimacy-related speech events are 
the most commonly-reported form of speech events in partners’ everyday talk. Within GCDRs, 
in contrast, it is expected that partners’ talk will be more balanced between intimate and non-
intimate speech events.
Other aspects of communication potentially influenced by the situational constraints of 
geographic separation are conflict and taboo topic avoidance. In general, as relationships become 
more interdependent, partners should be motivated to obtain information about their partner to 
determine the appropriateness of their mate selection (Morton & Douglas, 1981; Surra & 
Hughes, 1997). Although relational length is a strong predictor of later marital stability, it is not 
the length of dating, per se, that is most important, but rather the partner knowledge acquired 
during that time (Huston, 1994). That is, one’s understanding of one’s partner’s likes and dislikes 
and personality characteristics occurs through accumulated everyday talk (Duck, 1994). 
Consistent with this view, premarital counselors advise couples who have known each other a 
short period of time to delay marriage to allow for increased deliberation about their readiness 
and compatibility (Holman, Larson, & Harmer, 1994; Stanley, 2001). 
Perhaps indicative of dating partners’ desire to learn about their partners throughout 
courtship, research based on geographically-proximal dating couples has found that conflict and 
6


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 6 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.