All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Fixed" Sentencing Reforms: The Effect on the Racial Composition of Imprisonment Rates Over Time
Unformatted Document Text:            Leymon 19    imprisonment rates with controls for percent African American and percent Hispanic.  The results reveal  that “fixed” sentencing reforms are significantly and positively related to greater increases in  imprisonment rates for blacks, whites, and Hispanics in all three models, with the exception of  determinate sentencing among the African American imprisonment rate.  This indicates that there is a  relationship between states that have implemented sentencing reforms and the increase imprisonment  rates for blacks, whites and Hispanics.      Table 1 About Here       Along with the logarithmic growth curve variables for “fixed” sentencing reforms, all three models also  included controls for percent African American and Hispanic.  The results of all three models indicated  that percent Hispanic is positively associated with higher rates of imprisonment across all racial/ethnic  groups.  Conversely, percent African American was negatively associated with rates of incarceration  across all three racial/ethnic groups.  The negative significant effect of percent black on the black  imprisonment rate (Model 1) is unexpected. 18   The explanation for the negative association between  percent African American and the white and Hispanic imprisonment rate is also unexpected.  It should be noted that Table 2 represents analysis of three separate dependent variables.  The  different dependent variables do not allow for direct comparisons between the results of the different  racial/ethnic groups as presented here.  The larger coefficients for African Americans (for each of the  variables) over both whites and Hispanics and the larger coefficients for Hispanics than whites are at least  partly a result of differences in the dependent variables. 19   For example, African Americans and Hispanics                                                    18  For example, while the South has the highest percent African American of all the regions in the United States, the South  does not necessarily have the highest rates of black imprisonment per 1000 blacks.  A number of states outside the South have extremely high rates of African Americans within their correctional systems, but have a relatively low percent African Americans in their state.  Furthermore, the majority of the highest per-capita rates of black imprisonment are not in the states with the highest percentage of African-Americans.    19  The difference could also be partly caused by a difference in the effects of any one of the independent variables on the  dependent variable, but in the analysis presented in table 2 it is impossible to “tease out” the differential effects. 

Authors: Harmon, Mark.
first   previous   Page 19 of 29   next   last



background image
 
 
 
 
 
Leymon 19 
 
imprisonment rates with controls for percent African American and percent Hispanic.  The results reveal 
that “fixed” sentencing reforms are significantly and positively related to greater increases in 
imprisonment rates for blacks, whites, and Hispanics in all three models, with the exception of 
determinate sentencing among the African American imprisonment rate.  This indicates that there is a 
relationship between states that have implemented sentencing reforms and the increase imprisonment 
rates for blacks, whites and Hispanics.   
 
Table 1 About Here 
  
 
Along with the logarithmic growth curve variables for “fixed” sentencing reforms, all three models also 
included controls for percent African American and Hispanic.  The results of all three models indicated 
that percent Hispanic is positively associated with higher rates of imprisonment across all racial/ethnic 
groups.  Conversely, percent African American was negatively associated with rates of incarceration 
across all three racial/ethnic groups.  The negative significant effect of percent black on the black 
imprisonment rate (Model 1) is unexpected.
18
  The explanation for the negative association between 
percent African American and the white and Hispanic imprisonment rate is also unexpected. 
It should be noted that Table 2 represents analysis of three separate dependent variables.  The 
different dependent variables do not allow for direct comparisons between the results of the different 
racial/ethnic groups as presented here.  The larger coefficients for African Americans (for each of the 
variables) over both whites and Hispanics and the larger coefficients for Hispanics than whites are at least 
partly a result of differences in the dependent variables.
19
  For example, African Americans and Hispanics 
                                                 
18
 For example, while the South has the highest percent African American of all the regions in the United States, the South 
does not necessarily have the highest rates of black imprisonment per 1000 blacks.  A number of states outside the South 
have extremely high rates of African Americans within their correctional systems, but have a relatively low percent 
African Americans in their state.  Furthermore, the majority of the highest per-capita rates of black imprisonment are not 
in the states with the highest percentage of African-Americans.   
19
 The difference could also be partly caused by a difference in the effects of any one of the independent variables on the 
dependent variable, but in the analysis presented in table 2 it is impossible to “tease out” the differential effects. 


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 29   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.