All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Gender, Security and U.S. Illicit Drug Control Policy--Victims and Vamps, Madonnas and Whores: The Construction of Women Drug Couriers and the Practices of a Security State
Unformatted Document Text:  Gender, Security and U.S. Illicit Drug Control Policy--VICTIMS AND VAMPS, MADONNAS AND WHORES: THE CONSTRUCTION OF WOMEN DRUG COURIERS AND THE PRACTICES OF A SECURITY STATE by Ellie Schemenauer ## email not listed ## University of Wisconsin-Whitewater WORK IN PROGRESS: PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION. Introduction The increasing militarization of the U.S. “war on drugs” throughout the later decades of the 20 th century and into the 21 st century has been well documented (e.g., Campbell 1998; Common Sense for Drug Policy 2004; Desch, Dominguez and Serbin 1998; Drug Policy Alliance 2004; Enloe 2000; Griffith 1997; Isacson 2004; Mabry 1989; Perl 1989; Wisotsky 1990). Militarized discourses of U.S. illicit drug control have frequented U.S. Congressional Hearings on the topic and have informed general policy discussions (e.g., U.S. Congress 1996; U.S. Senate 2004). Indeed, in the last two decades, U.S. illicit drug control policy has often been characterized by talk of “superior weaponry, manpower and troop strength” (Barwa 1997: 33), innumerable comparisons to Vietnam (Barwa 1997: 33; Mitchell 1998: 110) and the Cold War (Blagojevich 1997: 6; Wilhelm 1998: 5), as well as the more recent attempt by some policy specialists to think about the “war on drugs” in terms of the “war on terror.” 1 In these discourses of war, the enemies imagined are highly masculinized. For example, as former Senator Bob Graham once put it: “We are fighting a well-organized, well-financed and determined enemy, 1 For example, on December 14, 2001, President George W. Bush said in a speech: “It’s important for Americans to know that trafficking drugs finances the world of terror, sustaining terrorists; if you quit drugs, you join the fight against terrorism (quoted in Appel and Olds 2002). On February 3, 2002, on Super Bowl Sunday, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy followed the above comment up by premiering a series of public service announcements that linked illicit drugs with terrorism. 1

Authors: Schemenauer, Ellie.
first   previous   Page 1 of 38   next   last



background image
Gender, Security and U.S. Illicit Drug Control Policy--
VICTIMS AND VAMPS, MADONNAS AND WHORES: THE CONSTRUCTION OF
WOMEN DRUG COURIERS AND THE PRACTICES OF A SECURITY STATE
by Ellie Schemenauer
## email not listed ##
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
WORK IN PROGRESS: PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
WITHOUT PERMISSION.
Introduction
The increasing militarization of the U.S. “war on drugs” throughout the later
decades of the 20
th
century and into the 21
st
century has been well documented (e.g.,
Campbell 1998; Common Sense for Drug Policy 2004; Desch, Dominguez and Serbin
1998; Drug Policy Alliance 2004; Enloe 2000; Griffith 1997; Isacson 2004; Mabry 1989;
Perl 1989; Wisotsky 1990). Militarized discourses of U.S. illicit drug control have
frequented U.S. Congressional Hearings on the topic and have informed general policy
discussions (e.g., U.S. Congress 1996; U.S. Senate 2004). Indeed, in the last two
decades, U.S. illicit drug control policy has often been characterized by talk of “superior
weaponry, manpower and troop strength” (Barwa 1997: 33), innumerable comparisons to
Vietnam (Barwa 1997: 33; Mitchell 1998: 110) and the Cold War (Blagojevich 1997: 6;
Wilhelm 1998: 5), as well as the more recent attempt by some policy specialists to think
about the “war on drugs” in terms of the “war on terror.”
In these discourses of war, the
enemies imagined are highly masculinized. For example, as former Senator Bob Graham
once put it: “We are fighting a well-organized, well-financed and determined enemy,
1
For example, on December 14, 2001, President George W. Bush said in a speech: “It’s important for
Americans to know that trafficking drugs finances the world of terror, sustaining terrorists; if you quit
drugs, you join the fight against terrorism (quoted in Appel and Olds 2002). On February 3, 2002, on
Super Bowl Sunday, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy followed the above comment
up by premiering a series of public service announcements that linked illicit drugs with terrorism.
1


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 38   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.