All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Why Does Canvassing Work?
Unformatted Document Text:  “Why Does Canvassing Work?” Jones, Karen. Oct. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107(1): 4-25. Jones, Philip and John Hudson. 2000. “Civic Duty and Expressive Voting: Is Virtue its Own Reward?” Kyklos 53: 1, 3-16. Knack, Stephen and Martha E. Kropf. 1998. “For Shame! The Effect of Community Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting.” Political Psychology 19(3): 585-599. Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4): 560-572. Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Altruistic Trust” in Democracy & Trust. Ed. Mark E.Warren. Cambridge: 290ff. Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political Behavior 25(3): 247-263. Michelson, Melissa R. 2005. “Meeting the Challenges of Latino Voter Mobilization.” ANNALS 601(1): 85-101. Nickerson, David W. 2006. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence From Eight Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 34: 271-292. Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102: 49-57. Niven, David. 2002. “The Mobilization Calendar: The Time-Dependent Effects of Personal Contact on Turnout.” American Politics Research 30: 307-322. Niven, David. 2004. “The Mobilization Solution? Face-to-Face Contact and Voter Turnout in a Municipal Election.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 868-884. Price, David E. and Michael Lupfer. 1973. “Volunteers for Gore: the Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities.” Journal of Politics 35(2): 410-438. Pattie, CJ and RJ Johnston 2003. “Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997.” British Journal of Politics 33: 303-322. Ordeshook, Peter C. and William H. Riker, 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42. Research Agenda Mohanty 22

Authors: Mohanty, Peter.
first   previous   Page 22 of 23   next   last



background image
“Why Does Canvassing Work?”
Jones, Karen. Oct. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107(1): 4-25.
Jones, Philip and John Hudson. 2000. “Civic Duty and Expressive Voting: Is Virtue its
Own Reward?” Kyklos 53: 1, 3-16.
Knack, Stephen and Martha E. Kropf. 1998. “For Shame! The Effect of Community
Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting.” Political Psychology 19(3):
585-599.
Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.”
The Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4): 560-572.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Altruistic Trust” in Democracy & Trust. Ed. Mark E.Warren.
Cambridge: 290ff.
Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door
Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political
Behavior
25(3): 247-263.
Michelson, Melissa R. 2005. “Meeting the Challenges of Latino Voter Mobilization.”
ANNALS 601(1): 85-101.
Nickerson, David W. 2006. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence
From Eight Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 34: 271-292.
Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field
Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102: 49-57.
Niven, David. 2002. “The Mobilization Calendar: The Time-Dependent Effects of
Personal Contact on Turnout.” American Politics Research 30: 307-322.
Niven, David. 2004. “The Mobilization Solution? Face-to-Face Contact and Voter
Turnout in a Municipal Election.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 868-884.
Price, David E. and Michael Lupfer. 1973. “Volunteers for Gore: the Impact of a
Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities.” Journal of Politics 35(2):
410-438.
Pattie, CJ and RJ Johnston 2003. “Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone
Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997.” British Journal of Politics
33: 303-322.
Ordeshook, Peter C. and William H. Riker, 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.”
American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42.
Research Agenda
Mohanty 22


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 22 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.