All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Why Does Canvassing Work?
Unformatted Document Text:  “Why Does Canvassing Work?” Jones, Karen. Oct. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107(1): 4-25. Jones, Philip and John Hudson. 2000. “Civic Duty and Expressive Voting: Is Virtue its Own Reward?” Kyklos 53: 1, 3-16. Knack, Stephen and Martha E. Kropf. 1998. “For Shame! The Effect of Community Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting.” Political Psychology 19(3): 585-599. Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4): 560-572. Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Altruistic Trust” in Democracy & Trust. Ed. Mark E.Warren. Cambridge: 290ff. Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political Behavior 25(3): 247-263. Michelson, Melissa R. 2005. “Meeting the Challenges of Latino Voter Mobilization.” ANNALS 601(1): 85-101. Nickerson, David W. 2006. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence From Eight Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 34: 271-292. Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102: 49-57. Niven, David. 2002. “The Mobilization Calendar: The Time-Dependent Effects of Personal Contact on Turnout.” American Politics Research 30: 307-322. Niven, David. 2004. “The Mobilization Solution? Face-to-Face Contact and Voter Turnout in a Municipal Election.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 868-884. Price, David E. and Michael Lupfer. 1973. “Volunteers for Gore: the Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities.” Journal of Politics 35(2): 410-438. Pattie, CJ and RJ Johnston 2003. “Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997.” British Journal of Politics 33: 303-322. Ordeshook, Peter C. and William H. Riker, 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42. Research Agenda Mohanty 22

Authors: Mohanty, Peter.
first   previous   Page 22 of 23   next   last



background image
“Why Does Canvassing Work?”
Jones, Karen. Oct. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107(1): 4-25.
Jones, Philip and John Hudson. 2000. “Civic Duty and Expressive Voting: Is Virtue its
Own Reward?” Kyklos 53: 1, 3-16.
Knack, Stephen and Martha E. Kropf. 1998. “For Shame! The Effect of Community
Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting.” Political Psychology 19(3):
585-599.
Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.”
The Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4): 560-572.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Altruistic Trust” in Democracy & Trust. Ed. Mark E.Warren.
Cambridge: 290ff.
Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door
Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political
Behavior
25(3): 247-263.
Michelson, Melissa R. 2005. “Meeting the Challenges of Latino Voter Mobilization.”
ANNALS 601(1): 85-101.
Nickerson, David W. 2006. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence
From Eight Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 34: 271-292.
Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field
Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102: 49-57.
Niven, David. 2002. “The Mobilization Calendar: The Time-Dependent Effects of
Personal Contact on Turnout.” American Politics Research 30: 307-322.
Niven, David. 2004. “The Mobilization Solution? Face-to-Face Contact and Voter
Turnout in a Municipal Election.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 868-884.
Price, David E. and Michael Lupfer. 1973. “Volunteers for Gore: the Impact of a
Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities.” Journal of Politics 35(2):
410-438.
Pattie, CJ and RJ Johnston 2003. “Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone
Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997.” British Journal of Politics
33: 303-322.
Ordeshook, Peter C. and William H. Riker, 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.”
American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42.
Research Agenda
Mohanty 22


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 22 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.