All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Boxing Pandora: Defining Borders in a Democratizing World
Unformatted Document Text:  international perspective, they share a single national identity and, perhaps, a common destiny. 2 The presence – and perhaps conflation of the empirical and the normative is evident. Yet since the Second World War, heterodox claims have repeatedly intruded into the debate, in recognition of the shortcomings of both the extant political-legal dispensation in responding to collective expressions of identity in politics. Even the supposedly settled meanings of self-determination have remained open to change; rhetorical claims about collective polities – whether ethnic groups or the people within a state – have always persisted, and beginning in the 1960s, UN documents began to give self-determination meaning in a broader perspective. Developing these opportunities, academic observers and international actors alike have been making more progressive claims about a right to democratization and even, lately, ‘regime change’ (whether styled as internal self-determination or not) that increasingly raise questions about the legitimacy of existing governments and states. And alongside this growing debate about internal self-determination, the claims of ethno- national groupings to self-determination as they understand it, though seldom legitimated, have persisted. Since the end of the Cold War, such claims have been increasingly prominent and perhaps more frequent; they have also been more prominent in rights discourse – appearing in such documents as the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, the draft UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and more broadly in debates within political science and policy about autonomy and federalism. Yet these rising voices have not been matched by alteration in the limited canon of agreed doctrines that largely persists in preserving, and thus marginalizing, external, state-formative self-determination in a moribund category (decolonization) while focusing on internal democratization as the frontier of development. In this vein, the 2 Yuval Shany, Redrawing Maps, Manipulating Demographics: On Exchange of Populated Territories and Self-Determination, 2 L. & E THICS H UM R TS . __ (2007, forthcoming).

Authors: Waters, Timothy.
first   previous   Page 2 of 44   next   last



background image
international perspective, they share a single national identity and, perhaps, a common
destiny.
The presence – and perhaps conflation of the empirical and the normative is
evident.
Yet since the Second World War, heterodox claims have repeatedly intruded into the
debate, in recognition of the shortcomings of both the extant political-legal dispensation
in responding to collective expressions of identity in politics.
Even the supposedly settled meanings of self-determination have remained open to
change; rhetorical claims about collective polities – whether ethnic groups or the people
within a state – have always persisted, and beginning in the 1960s, UN documents began
to give self-determination meaning in a broader perspective. Developing these
opportunities, academic observers and international actors alike have been making more
progressive claims about a right to democratization and even, lately, ‘regime
change’ (whether styled as internal self-determination or not) that increasingly raise
questions about the legitimacy of existing governments and states.
And alongside this growing debate about internal self-determination, the claims of ethno-
national groupings to self-determination as they understand it, though seldom legitimated,
have persisted. Since the end of the Cold War, such claims have been increasingly
prominent and perhaps more frequent; they have also been more prominent in rights
discourse – appearing in such documents as the Council of Europe’s Framework
Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, the draft UN Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and more broadly in debates within political science and
policy about autonomy and federalism.
Yet these rising voices have not been matched by alteration in the limited canon of
agreed doctrines that largely persists in preserving, and thus marginalizing, external,
state-formative self-determination in a moribund category (decolonization) while
focusing on internal democratization as the frontier of development. In this vein, the
2
Yuval Shany, Redrawing Maps, Manipulating Demographics: On Exchange of Populated Territories and
Self-Determination, 2 L. & E
THICS
H
UM
R
TS
. __ (2007, forthcoming).


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 44   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.