|
|
|
|
Social Movement Interest Groups, Political Parties and Policy Change |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The social movement literature addresses the bureaucratization of social movements into social movement organizations or interest groups (Costain and Costain, 1987; Piven and Cloward, 1979; and Tarrow, 1994). However, there is a dearth of literature on the unique relationship between this type of interest group (Social Movement Interest Groups – SMIGs) and the political parties that support their issue. SMIGs are constrained both by their attachment to the movement from which they evolved and their acceptance by only one of the two major political parties (the Home Party). These dynamics imply but do not necessarily predetermine a compromised political position.
This study examines two groups of national-level SMIGs and their relationship with their respective Home Party: pro-life interest groups and the Republican Party and gay rights interest groups and the Democratic Party. Findings are based on 50 interviews with interest group representatives, lawmakers and academics. This research reveals that social movement interest group status does not, by default, compromise the ability of an interest group to influence pubic policy (to exert power). SMIGs can and do exert significant influence despite the constraints of the movement and the parties, however, a SMIG’s power is mediated by its resources as well as the level of acceptance by the party. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
life (255), abort (214), pro (204), parti (191), pro-lif (180), republican (142), right (116), support (98), smig (92), famili (88), issu (85), platform (85), movement (79), democrat (67), nation (64), state (59), christian (58), 2005 (54), group (52), discuss (49), posit (49), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association URL: http://www.spsa.net
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Allen, Victoria. "Social Movement Interest Groups, Political Parties and Policy Change" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA, Jan 03, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-10-09 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143089_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Allen, V. H. , 2007-01-03 "Social Movement Interest Groups, Political Parties and Policy Change" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA Online <PDF>. 2008-10-09 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143089_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The social movement literature addresses the bureaucratization of social movements into social movement organizations or interest groups (Costain and Costain, 1987; Piven and Cloward, 1979; and Tarrow, 1994). However, there is a dearth of literature on the unique relationship between this type of interest group (Social Movement Interest Groups – SMIGs) and the political parties that support their issue. SMIGs are constrained both by their attachment to the movement from which they evolved and their acceptance by only one of the two major political parties (the Home Party). These dynamics imply but do not necessarily predetermine a compromised political position.
This study examines two groups of national-level SMIGs and their relationship with their respective Home Party: pro-life interest groups and the Republican Party and gay rights interest groups and the Democratic Party. Findings are based on 50 interviews with interest group representatives, lawmakers and academics. This research reveals that social movement interest group status does not, by default, compromise the ability of an interest group to influence pubic policy (to exert power). SMIGs can and do exert significant influence despite the constraints of the movement and the parties, however, a SMIG’s power is mediated by its resources as well as the level of acceptance by the party. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
48 |
| Word count: |
18357 |
| Text sample: |
| Social Movement Interest Groups Political Parties and Policy Change: The Case of the Pro-Life Movement and the Republican Party Victoria Heavey Allen CUNY Graduate Center victoriaallen@verizon.net Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association New Orleans Louisiana January 3-7 2007. Copyright by the Southern Political Science Association. Social movement interest groups (SMIGs) that evolved out of social movements have been examined by very few scholars of interest groups1. And although social movement scholars do examine |
| New York: Norton. Wald Kenneth D. 1997. Religion and Politics in the United States. 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. ———. 2002. "The Context of Gay Politics." In The Politics of Gay Rights ed. C. A. Rimmerman K. D. Wald and C. Wilcox. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Wilcox Clyde. 1992. God's Warriors: The Christian Right in Twentieth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ———. 1995. "The Sources and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion." In Perspectives on the |
Similar Titles:
Online Discussion Groups, Situation Movement States, and Dialogic Quality: The Potential for Democratic Electronic Public Spheres
Christian Right Strength in State Republican Parties: The Role of 'Religious Threat'
The Welfare State, Public Opinion, and Power Resources Theory: Social Rights Support and Welfare State Regimes in Cross-National Perspective
|
|