|
|
|
|
Co-Advantages of Patients’ Internet Use for Cancer Information: Oncologist-Patient Communication and Socioeconomic Status |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The influences of patients’ Internet health-information seeking on the physician-patient relationship, and on disparities in health care, are debated with little evidence to inform the issues. Access to the Internet is associated with socioeconomic status. However, whether access to Internet-based health information reduces disparities in health care is unknown. Even less is known about these issues in clinical oncology interactions, where being informed is especially critical to decision making. This study (a) analyzes relationships between patients’ reports of post-diagnosis use of the Internet for cancer information and relational features of communication with oncologists (e.g., closeness, control, language as coded from videotapes), patients’ use of other sources of information about cancer (e.g., print, electronic, and interpersonal sources), patients’ self-assessments of their specialized knowledge (e.g., behavioral science, medicine, natural sciences); and (b) investigates the role of patients’ socioeconomic status in mediating those relationships. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
internet (209), patient (177), inform (162), use (151), health (106), physician (94), cancer (86), relationship (70), 001 (48), care (42), sourc (42), communic (40), co (37), advantag (36), co-advantag (35), interact (35), physician-pati (31), factor (30), knowledg (29), research (28), educ (27), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Cline, Rebecca J.., Albrecht, Terrance., Penner, Louis A.., Ruckdeschel, John C.., Foster, Tanina S. . and Harper, Felicity. "Co-Advantages of Patients’ Internet Use for Cancer Information: Oncologist-Patient Communication and Socioeconomic Status" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY, <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14339_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Cline, R. J., Albrecht, T. L., Penner, L. , Ruckdeschel, J. , Foster, T. and Harper, F. "Co-Advantages of Patients’ Internet Use for Cancer Information: Oncologist-Patient Communication and Socioeconomic Status" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY Online <PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14339_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The influences of patients’ Internet health-information seeking on the physician-patient relationship, and on disparities in health care, are debated with little evidence to inform the issues. Access to the Internet is associated with socioeconomic status. However, whether access to Internet-based health information reduces disparities in health care is unknown. Even less is known about these issues in clinical oncology interactions, where being informed is especially critical to decision making. This study (a) analyzes relationships between patients’ reports of post-diagnosis use of the Internet for cancer information and relational features of communication with oncologists (e.g., closeness, control, language as coded from videotapes), patients’ use of other sources of information about cancer (e.g., print, electronic, and interpersonal sources), patients’ self-assessments of their specialized knowledge (e.g., behavioral science, medicine, natural sciences); and (b) investigates the role of patients’ socioeconomic status in mediating those relationships. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
33 |
| Word count: |
8441 |
| Text sample: |
| Co-Advantages of Internet Use 1 Patients increasingly rely on the Internet as a source for health information. However the influence of patients’ use of the Internet for health information on the physician-patient relationship is debated. The literature on this issue is characterized by anecdotal evidence and opinion with little empirical evidence to inform the issue. A second issue related to patients’ use of the Internet for health information is its impact on disparities in health care. Evidence indicates clearly |
| (116) (102) .002 > .24 Age - .22 - .20 (123) (123) .016 .033 Education .39 (124) < .001 Household Income .36 (115) < .001 SES .44 (114) < .001 ______________________________________________________ * pr represents a partial correlation while controlling for SES. Values presented are: r or pr degrees of freedom and p. |
Similar Titles:
Interactive Health Communication as a Support for Prostate Cancer Patients
Decentralization of Health Care: Understanding the Relationship Between Values, Social Interaction and Health Policy
Clinician-Patient Dialogue About Internet Health Information: Legitimating Patients Through Communication
User-Centered Interaction Design: Enhancing the External Validity of Communication Support for Health Care Teams
Doctor-Patient Relationship as Motivation and Outcome: Examining Uses of an Interactive Cancer Communication System
|
|