Author's Keywords: internet, legitimation, physician-patient communication	Convention All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14775_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Bylund, Carma., Sabee, Christina., Aldridge, Amy. and Imes, Rebecca. "Clinician-Patient Dialogue About Internet Health Information: Legitimating Patients Through Communication" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY, <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14775_index.html>

Bylund, C. , Sabee, C. M., Aldridge, A. N. and Imes, R. S. "Clinician-Patient Dialogue About Internet Health Information: Legitimating Patients Through Communication" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY Online <PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14775_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The importance of the Internet to patients seeking health information has been well established. Although it is understood that communication about Internet information occurs in medical encounters, research has been limited about the actual occurrence of talk between clinicians and patients about health information that the patient has found on the Internet. We conducted a study to examine patients’ experiences talking to their clinicians about Internet health information. The study sample (n=920) was recruited from Internet health message boards to participate in an online survey. Participants in the study sample reported that they had researched their or their loved one’s health on the Internet within the last year and had talked with a clinician about that information. Participants completed a 30-item survey, including questions focusing on participants’ recent, recalled encounters with a clinician. There was no difference between male and female clinicians’ use of legitimation behaviors or between male and female patients’ perceptions of such behaviors. A small correlation was found behind patient/clinician familiarity and legitimation behaviors. Legitimation was significantly associated with patient satisfaction ratings. Interestingly, patient satisfaction ratings were relatively low. A second patient outcome, change in concern, was also associated with the degree to which the patient felt legitimated by the clinician. An understanding of the occurrence of clinician-patient talk about Internet health information and its relationship to patient outcomes is important for practicing clinicians as well as medical educators who seek to better understand, and thus improve, the communicative nature of the medical encounter.

8. Can We Talk? Initiating Conversations between Women and Their Health Care Providers about Weight Loss Activities Using Self-rated Health

Does Patient-Provider Race/Ethnicity Mix Matter in Health Care Access and Use? Evidence from MEPS 2002

The Reflective Practitioner Process: Using participatory action research methods to engage health care providers in research, and to increase the relevance of research to practice.

Co-Advantages of Patients’ Internet Use for Cancer Information: Oncologist-Patient Communication and Socioeconomic Status