Citation

Is Familial Commitment a Choice or an Obligation? Applying the Investment Model to Family Communication Research

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

The decision to stay in or leave a current relationship is a phenomenon furiously investigated by close relationship researchers. Rusbult, Drigotas, and Verette (1994) suggest that individuals who are happy will remain in their relationship; however, understanding the variables associated with satisfaction may clue us into how and why individuals stay in that relationship when their satisfaction has been challenged. The investment model of developing relationships was offered as a way to predict such commitment and satisfaction in ongoing relationships (Rusbult, 1980a). But is commitment always a choice? With its roots in attraction literature (Rusbult, 1991), the investment model appears to be a far stretch when applying the bases of commitment to familial relationships. The involuntary nature of family ties (Matthews & Rosner, 1988) implies that individuals are expected to always be part of the family they were born into, thus, participating in “permanent commitment” not necessarily experienced in romantic relationships, friendships, or working relationships. The aim of the paper is to explicate commitment as described by Rusbult’s (1980a) investment model and to integrate Johnson’s (1991a) commitment framework to further illustrate the importance of commitment in family and to demonstrate through empirical evidence, the insight this integrated model may provide family communication researchers.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

relationship (153), commit (142), invest (135), famili (102), model (83), may (73), rusbult (72), parent (68), individu (52), child (37), johnson (37), children (36), satisfact (36), research (34), level (32), altern (27), et (26), al (26), predict (26), person (25), reward (23),

Author's Keywords:

Family, Investment Model, Commitment
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Communication Association
URL:
http://www.icahdq.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p171863_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Lucas, Alysa. "Is Familial Commitment a Choice or an Obligation? Applying the Investment Model to Family Communication Research" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, San Francisco, CA, May 23, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-11-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p171863_index.html>

APA Citation:

Lucas, A. A. , 2007-05-23 "Is Familial Commitment a Choice or an Obligation? Applying the Investment Model to Family Communication Research" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, San Francisco, CA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2008-11-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p171863_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The decision to stay in or leave a current relationship is a phenomenon furiously investigated by close relationship researchers. Rusbult, Drigotas, and Verette (1994) suggest that individuals who are happy will remain in their relationship; however, understanding the variables associated with satisfaction may clue us into how and why individuals stay in that relationship when their satisfaction has been challenged. The investment model of developing relationships was offered as a way to predict such commitment and satisfaction in ongoing relationships (Rusbult, 1980a). But is commitment always a choice? With its roots in attraction literature (Rusbult, 1991), the investment model appears to be a far stretch when applying the bases of commitment to familial relationships. The involuntary nature of family ties (Matthews & Rosner, 1988) implies that individuals are expected to always be part of the family they were born into, thus, participating in “permanent commitment” not necessarily experienced in romantic relationships, friendships, or working relationships. The aim of the paper is to explicate commitment as described by Rusbult’s (1980a) investment model and to integrate Johnson’s (1991a) commitment framework to further illustrate the importance of commitment in family and to demonstrate through empirical evidence, the insight this integrated model may provide family communication researchers.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 26
Word count: 6119
Text sample:
Investment in Family 1 Running Head: INVESTMENT IN FAMILY Is Commitment a Choice or an Obligation? Applying the Investment Model to Family Communication Research Investment in Family 2 Abstract The decision to stay in or leave a current relationship is a phenomenon furiously investigated by close relationship researchers. Rusbult Drigotas and Verette (1994) suggest that individuals who are happy will remain in their relationship; however understanding the variables associated with satisfaction may clue us into how and why individuals
“Attitude Toward Commitment” includes the tripartite of commitment as described by Johnson (1991a) including: personal commitment moral commitment and structural commitment. Investment in Family 26 Figure 4. Rusbult’s Investment Model with Inclusion of Typology of Responses. Satisfaction Level Quality of Commitment EVLN Alternatives Level Response Investment Size Note: EVLN represents the four responses of Rusbult et al.’s (1983) typology including exit voice loyalty and neglect.


Similar Titles:
When the Parent has Cancer: Adult Child Perceptions of Communication Competency, Humor Orientation, and Relational Satisfaction in the Older Adult Parent-Adult Child Relationship

Re-Conceptualizing “Parent” Education in Predicting Children’s Educational Attainment: How Attention to the Non-Residential Parent’s Education is Key to Understanding the Lower Educational Outcomes of Children Raised in Single Parent Families

Neighborhoods, Quality of Parent-Child Relationships, and Peer Behaviors: Impacts on Delinquency in Children.

Evaluating Differences in Health Care Quality Ratings in Children Based on the Level of Proxy Respondent Involvement with Child’s Care


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.