|
|
|
|
Recovering Democracy: The Emergence of Modern Democracy in the American and French Revolutions |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
When constructing the democratic peace thesis, Immanuel Kant’s seminal ‘Perpetual Peace’ is the usual starting point. This is despite the fact that the founder of the democratic peace thesis actually dismissed democracy in a most explicit fashion. For Kant, it was a growth in republics – identified by their representative system of government – which offered the possibility for ‘perpetual peace’. That we now generally talk of a democratic peace, rather than a republican peace, reflects the shift in democracy coming to be understood as a representative system of government. Even more basically, it is based on democracy coming to be considered as both practicable and desirable. Rather than concerning itself with the relationship between democracy and war, this paper focuses on a prior question that the democratic peace thesis presumes – how did democracy become a viable and desirable form of rule in the first place? It is argued that the key development was democracy shedding its classical meaning and coming to be understood as a representative form of rule. Democracy, understood as a representative, rather than direct, system of rule made it both practicable and desirable for modern states. This paper looks at the beginnings of this shift, highlighting the conceptual foundations of modern democracy. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
democraci (255), rule (93), form (83), repres (69), represent (68), concept (65), polit (58), paper (53), republ (45), mean (43), state (43), power (42), madison (40), modern (39), direct (39), govern (38), histor (36), democrat (36), peac (35), revolut (35), peopl (33), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Hobson, Christopher. "Recovering Democracy: The Emergence of Modern Democracy in the American and French Revolutions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-12-11 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180273_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Hobson, C. E. , 2007-02-28 "Recovering Democracy: The Emergence of Modern Democracy in the American and French Revolutions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA Online <PDF>. 2008-12-11 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180273_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: When constructing the democratic peace thesis, Immanuel Kant’s seminal ‘Perpetual Peace’ is the usual starting point. This is despite the fact that the founder of the democratic peace thesis actually dismissed democracy in a most explicit fashion. For Kant, it was a growth in republics – identified by their representative system of government – which offered the possibility for ‘perpetual peace’. That we now generally talk of a democratic peace, rather than a republican peace, reflects the shift in democracy coming to be understood as a representative system of government. Even more basically, it is based on democracy coming to be considered as both practicable and desirable. Rather than concerning itself with the relationship between democracy and war, this paper focuses on a prior question that the democratic peace thesis presumes – how did democracy become a viable and desirable form of rule in the first place? It is argued that the key development was democracy shedding its classical meaning and coming to be understood as a representative form of rule. Democracy, understood as a representative, rather than direct, system of rule made it both practicable and desirable for modern states. This paper looks at the beginnings of this shift, highlighting the conceptual foundations of modern democracy. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
25 |
| Word count: |
10939 |
| Text sample: |
| Recovering Democracy: The Emergence of Modern Democracy in the American and French Revolutions Christopher Hobson Department of International Relations Australian National University christopher.hobson@anu.edu.au Paper Prepared for ‘Democracy Solidarism and International Society’ Panel International Studies Association Convention 2007 Chicago USA February 28 – March 3 2007 Christopher Hobson – ISA Paper 2 Abstract When constructing the democratic peace thesis Immanuel Kant’s seminal ‘Perpetual Peace’ is the usual starting point. This is despite the fact that the founder of the democratic |
| democracy was (re)introduced to politics representation made democracy possible for modern states but it also immediately limited its possibilities. The historical structures of dēmokratia meant that when the concept returned to politics in the eighteenth century it remained a potent and dangerous idea. It only became politically acceptable and later desirable by having its most challenging dimensions – extensive participation greater social equality – removed or limited. This janus-faced legacy is one we are still dealing with today with |
Similar Titles:
Max Weber and Democracy: Can the People Have Political Power in Modern States?
Grafting participatory governance onto representative democracy and existing state institutions: Explaining outcomes via political society and civil society lenses
Political Discussion and the Self-Destructing State: An Historical Account of State-Sanctioned Talk in the German Democratic Republic from 1980-1985
Institutional Reform of European Local Politics and its Impact on Local Democracy. Revitalization by Means of Directly Elected Mayors and a Separation of Local Powers
|
|