Citation

Are Family-Friendly Policies Woman-Friendly? The Effects of Corporate Work-Family Policies on Women’s Representation in Management

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Many scholars link standard (family-unfriendly) workplace policies and practices to gender inequality, but it has been difficult to determine whether corporate work-family policies actually benefit women’s careers. Using national data on the sex and race composition of the managerial workforce and the personnel policies and benefits of over 800 U.S. private sector establishments, we investigate whether corporate work-family policies increase women’s representation in management. We distinguish between policies that help caregivers, who are still disproportionately women, subscribe to the “ideal worker norm” of unconditional devotion to work and work-family policies that challenge this norm. In fixed effects models with extensive control variables, we find that work-family policies that make minimal changes to existing expectations for committed workers such as child care benefits benefit women’s careers. Those policies that involve more substantial changes to the institutionalized expectations of when, where, and how much work is done do not succeed in moving more women into management.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

polici (165), work (152), women (135), manag (109), famili (109), 1 (82), effect (79), work-famili (66), men (63), leav (63), 0 (52), kelli (48), continu (45), white (44), time (43), black (43), benefit (42), kalev (39), organ (37), dobbin (37), eeo (37),

Author's Keywords:

work, family, gender, management
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p184864_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Kelly, Erin., Kalev, Alexandra. and Dobbin, Frank. "Are Family-Friendly Policies Woman-Friendly? The Effects of Corporate Work-Family Policies on Women’s Representation in Management" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-11-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p184864_index.html>

APA Citation:

Kelly, E. , Kalev, A. and Dobbin, F. , 2007-08-11 "Are Family-Friendly Policies Woman-Friendly? The Effects of Corporate Work-Family Policies on Women’s Representation in Management" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2008-11-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p184864_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Many scholars link standard (family-unfriendly) workplace policies and practices to gender inequality, but it has been difficult to determine whether corporate work-family policies actually benefit women’s careers. Using national data on the sex and race composition of the managerial workforce and the personnel policies and benefits of over 800 U.S. private sector establishments, we investigate whether corporate work-family policies increase women’s representation in management. We distinguish between policies that help caregivers, who are still disproportionately women, subscribe to the “ideal worker norm” of unconditional devotion to work and work-family policies that challenge this norm. In fixed effects models with extensive control variables, we find that work-family policies that make minimal changes to existing expectations for committed workers such as child care benefits benefit women’s careers. Those policies that involve more substantial changes to the institutionalized expectations of when, where, and how much work is done do not succeed in moving more women into management.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 31
Word count: 9455
Text sample:
Are Family-Friendly Policies Woman-Friendly? The Effects of Corporate Work-Family Policies on Women’s Representation in Management1 Erin L. Kelly Assistant Professor of Sociology University of Minnesota Alexandra Kalev RWJ Health Policy Scholar University of California Berkeley Frank Dobbin Professor of Sociology Harvard University 1 Thanks to Ronald Edwards of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for sharing the data and their expertise; the managers who participated in the survey; the Princeton Survey Research Center and Edward Freeland; Nicole Esparza and Leslie
-0.153 *** (0.034) -0.078 * (0.036) -0.458 *** (0.042) -0.129 *** (0.037) -0.040 (0.038) 1999 0.364 *** (0.043) -0.132 *** (0.035) -0.049 (0.036) -0.474 *** (0.042) -0.123 *** (0.037) -0.029 (0.039) 2000 0.380 *** (0.044) -0.041 (0.036) -0.065 (0.037) -0.446 *** (0.043) 0.074 (0.038) -0.014 (0.039) 2001 0.439 *** (0.044) -0.017 (0.036) -0.058 (0.037) -0.473 *** (0.043) 0.073 (0.038) -0.005 (0.039) Note: N (organization-year) = 18 595; N (organizations) = 820; * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001


Similar Titles:
Counterfactual Models of Family Policy Effects: Family Policy and Women’s Employment Outcomes in (West) Germany

Female-Head Family Formation Among Whites, Blacks, & Hispanics 1970-1990: Implications for Public Policy

Working Women and Work-Family Conflicts: A Comparison of Women of Color and White Women


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.