|
|
|
|
Gender, Race, and Perceived Health Risk: The white male effect in perceived heart risk |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Do white men fear various risks less than women and racial minorities? This study tested the white male effect in health risk perception. Using data from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, this study tried to explain gender and race difference in perceived risk of heart attack. Focusing on psychological (neuroticism) and behavioral (smoking pattern and exercise engagement) attributes, I examined the following hypotheses: (1) women and minorities have higher neuroticism and poorer health behaviros, (2) these attributes predict the higher perceived heart risk. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that the white male effect was only partially true in health risk perception. The psycholgical and behavioral risk factors could explain a great deal about why women had the higher pervceived heart risk than men. However, it failed to explain why racial minorities showed the lower perceived heart risk than whites. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
risk (118), perceiv (72), heart (64), gender (58), effect (51), race (45), variabl (41), smoke (38), exercis (38), health (37), higher (36), white (36), neurotic (34), age (30), group (28), minor (26), 1 (26), lower (26), educ (25), behavior (25), engag (24), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Kwon, Oh-Jung. "Gender, Race, and Perceived Health Risk: The white male effect in perceived heart risk" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-12-11 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p185134_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Kwon, O. , 2007-08-11 "Gender, Race, and Perceived Health Risk: The white male effect in perceived heart risk" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online <PDF>. 2008-12-11 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p185134_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Do white men fear various risks less than women and racial minorities? This study tested the white male effect in health risk perception. Using data from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, this study tried to explain gender and race difference in perceived risk of heart attack. Focusing on psychological (neuroticism) and behavioral (smoking pattern and exercise engagement) attributes, I examined the following hypotheses: (1) women and minorities have higher neuroticism and poorer health behaviros, (2) these attributes predict the higher perceived heart risk. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that the white male effect was only partially true in health risk perception. The psycholgical and behavioral risk factors could explain a great deal about why women had the higher pervceived heart risk than men. However, it failed to explain why racial minorities showed the lower perceived heart risk than whites. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
17 |
| Word count: |
4149 |
| Text sample: |
| Gender Race and Perceived Health Risk : “The white male effect” in the perceived heart risk Oh-Jung Kwon INTRODUCTION The notion of “the white male effect” suggests that white men are less concerned about variety of risks than women and minorities. Using data from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) I tested the white male effect in health risk perception by estimating the gender and race effect on the perceived heart risk. Focusing on |
| and Prescott Carol A. 2004. “The Interrelationship of Neuroticism Sex and Stressful Life Events in the Prediction of Episodes of Major Depression.” American Journal of Psychiatry Vol.161:631-636. Palmer Christina G.S. 2003. “Risk Perception: Another Look at the “White Male Effect.” Health Risk and Society Vol. 5 No.1: 71-83. Pennebaker J.W. 1982. The Psychology of Physical Symptoms. New York: Springer-Verlag. Renee Goodwin and Gunnar Engstrom. 2002 “Personality and the Perception of Health in the General Population” Psychological Medicine 32 (2002): |
Similar Titles:
Race-ethnicity, Gender, and Health Behavior Engagement between Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood
The Effect of Gender and Race on Student Engagement at a Predominantly White Institution
Do Group Characteristics Serve as Voting Cues? The Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender on Legislative Voting Behavior.
|
|