Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY URL: http://www.asc41.com
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p202148_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Kutnjak Ivkovich, Sanja. and Hagan, John. "Bargain Justice? Perceptions of Procedural Justice at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY, Atlanta Marriott Marquis, Atlanta, Georgia, Nov 13, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-12-11 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p202148_index.html>

Kutnjak Ivkovich, S. and Hagan, J. , 2007-11-13 "Bargain Justice? Perceptions of Procedural Justice at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY, Atlanta Marriott Marquis, Atlanta, Georgia Online <PDF>. 2008-12-11 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p202148_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: We use several perspectives on justice to explore how victims of war crimes view the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Using four samples of victims from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia collected over a period of eight years, we analyze how the victims view the ICTY’s trials and its decisions, and explore factors that affect their views of the ICTY. Over the eight-year period considered in our research, our respondents show an increasing level of dissatisfaction with the ICTY. With the passage of time, they are less likely to pick the ICTY as the appropriate decision-maker and less likely to view it as fair. They are becoming more convinced that the ICTY is lacking neutrality, while, at the same time, they also think that local courts are gaining more independence from political influence. Our results suggest that three issues explain the respondents’ growing dissatisfaction with the ICTY: their increased doubts about the ICTY’s neutrality, decision fairness, and the right to plea bargain. For victims who have no opportunities to participate in the trials themselves, it is a matter of trust in the decision-makers and the perceptions of decision fairness. A five-page description is included in the attachment.

Sampling Young Adults: The Effects of Survey Mode and Sampling Method on Inferences About Political Behavior

Bringing perceptions from the 'global village' into American political science: integrating international news coverage into undergraduate survey courses

The Causes and Consequences of Time Legislators Spend Fundraising for Themselves and for their Caucuses: Modeling Effects of Institutional Design and Personal and Political Context in State Legislatures