|
|
|
|
A Hazard-Model Approach to Propensity Score Estimation for Studying the Treatment Effect of an Event |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The propensity score method has increasingly become a popular strategy for studying the treatment effects in sociology. Developed in the context of policy/program evaluation, the methodological literature has typically assumed that whether an individual receives the treatment is endogenous but when an individual receives the treatment is exogenous. This assumption, despite plausible when the treatment of interest is a policy/program, is unlikely to hold when the treatment is an event. However, studying the effect of an event is a much more common research problem than studying the effect of a policy/program in sociological applications. In this paper, I discuss methodological issues regarding the conventional logit approach to propensity score estimation when applied to studying the effect of an event. Taking up on these issues, I propose a general hazard-model approach to propensity score estimation. This approach is preferable to the conventional approach in that it not only accommodates a plausible dynamic behavioral model for the treatment assignment mechanism of an event, but allows the investigator to include time-varying covariates as well. Empirical applications are illustrated by studying the average treatment effect of divorce on data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
score (55), propens (54), treatment (52), estim (42), model (40), effect (32), approach (29), studi (26), event (24), individu (24), time (24), divorc (23), covari (23), 1 (22), sociolog (22), assign (20), observ (20), hazard (19), ti (17), probabl (17), marriag (17), |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Li, Jui-Chung. "A Hazard-Model Approach to Propensity Score Estimation for Studying the Treatment Effect of an Event" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 12, 2005 <Not Available>. 2008-10-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p20695_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Li, J. A. , 2005-08-12 "A Hazard-Model Approach to Propensity Score Estimation for Studying the Treatment Effect of an Event" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2008-10-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p20695_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The propensity score method has increasingly become a popular strategy for studying the treatment effects in sociology. Developed in the context of policy/program evaluation, the methodological literature has typically assumed that whether an individual receives the treatment is endogenous but when an individual receives the treatment is exogenous. This assumption, despite plausible when the treatment of interest is a policy/program, is unlikely to hold when the treatment is an event. However, studying the effect of an event is a much more common research problem than studying the effect of a policy/program in sociological applications. In this paper, I discuss methodological issues regarding the conventional logit approach to propensity score estimation when applied to studying the effect of an event. Taking up on these issues, I propose a general hazard-model approach to propensity score estimation. This approach is preferable to the conventional approach in that it not only accommodates a plausible dynamic behavioral model for the treatment assignment mechanism of an event, but allows the investigator to include time-varying covariates as well. Empirical applications are illustrated by studying the average treatment effect of divorce on data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
16 |
| Word count: |
4055 |
| Text sample: |
| A Hazard-Model Approach to Propensity Score Estimation for Studying the Treatment Effect of an Event* January 17 2005 Jui-Chung Allen Li Department of Sociology New York University * Paper prepared for the 2005 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association in Philadelphia. I thank Lawrence L. Wu for his comments and advice and research support from the NICHD (HD 25500). Helpful discussions with Aimee Dechter and Kate Strully at an early stage are gratefully acknowledged. Direct correspondence to Jui-Chung |
| Effects of Wives’ Employment on Marital Dissolution.” American Sociological Review 66:226-45. 13 Tuma Nancy Brandon Michael T. Hannan and Lyle P. Groeneveld. 1979. “Dynamic Analysis of Event Histories.” American Journal of Sociology 84:820-54. Tuma Nancy Brandon and Michael T. Hannan. 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando FL: Academic Press. Waite Linda and Lee Lillard. 1991. “Children and Marital Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 96:930-53. Winship Christopher and Stephen L. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational |
Similar Titles:
Accounting for Individual Selection: How OLS Models Bias Estimations of the Effect of Contact Use
Quantile Treatment Effects in Observational Studies
The Effect of State and Trait Individualism-Collectivism on Attitude Change: A Functional Approach
|
|