|
|
|
|
Self Interest, Social Justice Principles, and Voting Behavior. An exploratory study on the microfoundations of the political economy of advanced welfare states under economic globalization |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Albeit widely employed as a standard assumption in macroeconomic theories, the preeminence of self interest in individuals’ behavior has been repeatedly questioned and disproved in an array of microlevel studies. This study restores the rationality assumption, but inserts amendments to it by means of exploring conflicting values arising at the intersection of social justice and self interest, against the backdrop of sharpened economic inequalities stemming from economic globalization. Specifically, it is investigated how voters prioritize among normative and pragmatic values in casting their votes on political parties of different ideological affiliations, and thereby generate value hierarchies. Methodologically, in order to take into account the cross-country variability in terms of different normative values embedded in political culture, hierarchical random-effects models (with voters nested within countries) are estimated on random probability samples of voters in advanced welfare states using two datasets (ISSP 1996 and CID joint ESS-US dataset 2002(2005), respectively). Findings lend support to the notion that individuals are neither irrational ideologues nor strictly utility maximizers, exhibiting a higher propensity to act upon their self interest the weaker their normative beliefs and the higher the stakes involved. Consequently, the voting decision process is not deterministic, but stochastic. The results bear the expectation of significant between-country countries differences, self interest being to varying extents overridden by fairness considerations, and different types of normative beliefs in turn being to varying degrees dominant over self interest. One across-country commonality is that self interest is more sensitive to egalitarian concerns than to individualist values, the threshold levels at which self interest is overridden by social justice considerations being lower. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
self (8), interest (8), univers (5), valu (5), differ (5), countri (5), polit (5), normat (4), voter (3), econom (3), professor (3), california (3), berkeley (3), vote (3), justic (3), paper (3), social (3), studi (3), teborg (2), advanc (2), welfar (2), |
Author's Keywords:
|
welfare state, public opinion, social justice, self interest, party choice |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Draghici, Diana. "Self Interest, Social Justice Principles, and Voting Behavior. An exploratory study on the microfoundations of the political economy of advanced welfare states under economic globalization" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2008-10-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208750_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Draghici, D. , 2007-08-30 "Self Interest, Social Justice Principles, and Voting Behavior. An exploratory study on the microfoundations of the political economy of advanced welfare states under economic globalization" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2008-10-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208750_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Albeit widely employed as a standard assumption in macroeconomic theories, the preeminence of self interest in individuals’ behavior has been repeatedly questioned and disproved in an array of microlevel studies. This study restores the rationality assumption, but inserts amendments to it by means of exploring conflicting values arising at the intersection of social justice and self interest, against the backdrop of sharpened economic inequalities stemming from economic globalization. Specifically, it is investigated how voters prioritize among normative and pragmatic values in casting their votes on political parties of different ideological affiliations, and thereby generate value hierarchies. Methodologically, in order to take into account the cross-country variability in terms of different normative values embedded in political culture, hierarchical random-effects models (with voters nested within countries) are estimated on random probability samples of voters in advanced welfare states using two datasets (ISSP 1996 and CID joint ESS-US dataset 2002(2005), respectively). Findings lend support to the notion that individuals are neither irrational ideologues nor strictly utility maximizers, exhibiting a higher propensity to act upon their self interest the weaker their normative beliefs and the higher the stakes involved. Consequently, the voting decision process is not deterministic, but stochastic. The results bear the expectation of significant between-country countries differences, self interest being to varying extents overridden by fairness considerations, and different types of normative beliefs in turn being to varying degrees dominant over self interest. One across-country commonality is that self interest is more sensitive to egalitarian concerns than to individualist values, the threshold levels at which self interest is overridden by social justice considerations being lower. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
1 |
| Word count: |
417 |
| Text sample: |
| Self Interest Social Justice Principles and Voting Behavior An exploratory study on the microfoundations of the political economy of advanced welfare states under economic globalization Diana C. Draghici Ph D Candidate Göteborg University Department of Political Science and Quality of Government Institute P.O. Box 711 SE-405 30 Göteborg Sweden Visiting Scholar University of California Berkeley Email: diana.draghici@pol.gu.se or ddraghici@berkeley.edu Abstract: Albeit widely employed as a standard assumption in macroeconomic theories the preeminence of self interest in individuals’ behavior has |
| concerns than to individualist values the threshold levels at which self interest is overridden by social justice considerations being lower. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL August 30 - September 2 2007 The author would like to hereby express her gratitude to Professor Jack Citrin at the University of California Berkeley for valuable comments and improvement suggestions at different stages of completion of this paper. The indications provided by Professor |
Similar Titles:
“Socialization, Self-Presentation and Political Ambition: A Study of Young Women’s Interest in Public Office”
Thinking about Chemistry, Social Identity and Political Tolerance: A Multi-Method Study of Individual Differences in Political Cognition
|
|