|
|
| | Economic Growth, Government Expenditures and Quality of Life in Developing and Transitioning States: Testing the Modernization Theory of Development |
| | Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
 | You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
| Abstract:
| Current research on modern economic growth patterns and improvements in quality of life in states indicates that while such improvements in well-being are not always solely the result of increasing economic growth, as modernization theory would postulate, findings in cross-sectional and time-series studies show that modern economic growth has improved quality of life (Easterlin and Angelescu, 2007). These findings of international comparisons of quality of life seem to build on previous research in the area of political economy of quality of life that indicated that economic strength is the most important factor influencing changes in quality of life in developing states (Moon, 1991; Highum, 2006).
Results from my pooled, cross-sectional time-series model on 57 developing states over a twelve-year timeframe indicated government expenditures on the military, on education and on health all have positive and significant effects on quality of life, while government expenditures on government itself (state size) have detrimental effects (Highum, 2006). I concluded that expenditures by the government that are connected to some part of the economy other than the state go to enhance the quality of life in that state.
This paper, therefore, proposes to narrow the focus of the research and more fully explore the relationship between economic growth, government expenditures and changes in quality of life in developing states, as well as test my measure of quality of life versus the Human Development Index measure used by the United Nations, in order to assist international financial institutions and government policymakers seeking to positively influence quality of life in the 21st century in developing and transitioning states. | Most Common Document Word Stems:
world (131), life (99), develop (98), state (97), qualiti (90), bank (63), econom (58), measur (57), nation (48), polit (47), d.c (41), index (41), studi (41), washington (40), health (40), unit (40), growth (39), new (37), intern (37), human (36), 72 (34), |
Author's Keywords:
| quality of life, modernization theory, theories of development, government expenditures, developing states |
|  | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
| Association:
Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES URL: http://www.isanet.org
| Citation:
| MLA Citation:
| Highum, Erick. "Economic Growth, Government Expenditures and Quality of Life in Developing and Transitioning States: Testing the Modernization Theory of Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 Online <PDF>. 2008-07-18 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p251187_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Highum, E. G. (2008, Mar) "Economic Growth, Government Expenditures and Quality of Life in Developing and Transitioning States: Testing the Modernization Theory of Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA Online <PDF> Retrieved 2008-07-18 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p251187_index.html |
Publication Type: Poster Abstract: Current research on modern economic growth patterns and improvements in quality of life in states indicates that while such improvements in well-being are not always solely the result of increasing economic growth, as modernization theory would postulate, findings in cross-sectional and time-series studies show that modern economic growth has improved quality of life (Easterlin and Angelescu, 2007). These findings of international comparisons of quality of life seem to build on previous research in the area of political economy of quality of life that indicated that economic strength is the most important factor influencing changes in quality of life in developing states (Moon, 1991; Highum, 2006).
Results from my pooled, cross-sectional time-series model on 57 developing states over a twelve-year timeframe indicated government expenditures on the military, on education and on health all have positive and significant effects on quality of life, while government expenditures on government itself (state size) have detrimental effects (Highum, 2006). I concluded that expenditures by the government that are connected to some part of the economy other than the state go to enhance the quality of life in that state.
This paper, therefore, proposes to narrow the focus of the research and more fully explore the relationship between economic growth, government expenditures and changes in quality of life in developing states, as well as test my measure of quality of life versus the Human Development Index measure used by the United Nations, in order to assist international financial institutions and government policymakers seeking to positively influence quality of life in the 21st century in developing and transitioning states. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: | PDF | | Page count: | 23 | | Word count: | 7544 | | Text sample: | | Economic Growth Government Expenditures and Quality of Life in Developing and Transitioning States: Testing the Modernization Theory of Development By Erick Highum Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-River Falls erickhighum@yahoo.com Prepared for presentation at 2008 International Studies Association Conference March 2008 San Francisco California. Introduction Current research on modern economic growth patterns and improvements in quality of life in states indicates that while such improvements in well-being are not always solely the result of increasing economic growth as | | Immanuel. (1974) The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press. Waring Marilyn. (1988) If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. New York: Harper Collins. Weede Erich. (1989) "Democracy and Income. Inequality Reconsidered. ". American Sociological Review. .54:865-68. Wolpin Miles.(1981) Militarism and Social Revolution in the Third World. Totawa N.J. Allanheld Osmun. World Health Organization World Health Report 2002. Geneva Switzerland. Young Oran R. (1968) Systems of Political Science. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc. Zuk Gary and William R. Thompson. |
Similar Titles:
Race and the State: The Importance of Original Incorporation in the Development of the United States for the Current Political-Social-Economic Status of National-Origin Groups
Subnational Governments, the Asian Development Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the World Bank: The Politics of Private Infrastructure Investment
|
|