|
|
|
|
Leaving the Legal Model Behind: A Consequence of a Pragmatic Analysis of Judicial Power and Review in the U.S.? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper is an initial attempt to address the somewhat shopworn but yet still compelling question whether the exercise of judicial power and review undermine aspirations for representative democracy. To get some measure beyond the shopworn it promotes a pragmatic approach to the question of judicial power and review. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
court (159), polit (119), judici (83), make (72), legal (69), model (67), friedman (67), 2003 (65), polici (62), review (52), normat (51), constitut (42), opinion (40), support (38), public (35), policy-mak (35), democrat (32), diffus (31), consider (31), new (30), law (30), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Strauber, Ira. "Leaving the Legal Model Behind: A Consequence of a Pragmatic Analysis of Judicial Power and Review in the U.S.?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2008-10-09 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41135_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Strauber, I. L. , 2005-09-01 "Leaving the Legal Model Behind: A Consequence of a Pragmatic Analysis of Judicial Power and Review in the U.S.?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2008-10-09 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41135_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This paper is an initial attempt to address the somewhat shopworn but yet still compelling question whether the exercise of judicial power and review undermine aspirations for representative democracy. To get some measure beyond the shopworn it promotes a pragmatic approach to the question of judicial power and review. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
8382 |
| Text sample: |
| “Leaving the Legal Model Behind: The Consequence of a Pragmatic Analysis of Judicial Power and Review in the U.S.?” Ira L. Strauber Department of Political Science Grinnell College DRAFT: NOT FOR QUOTATION OR CITATION Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 1 - September 4 2005. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. 2 INTRODUCTION This is another of those notorious “works in progress.” As part of a larger work on |
| DEMOCRACY. Cambridge MA. and London England: Harvard University Press. Rostow Eugene V. 1952. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review: 66-193. Smiley Marion. 1999. “Pragmatic Inquiry and Democratic Politics.” American Journal of Political Science. 43-639. Strauber Ira L. 2004. “The New Constitutionalism and Televising Supreme Court Oral Argument.” In progress. Strauber Ira L. 2003. “Framing Legal Aspirations.” Polity: XXXV: 491. Strauber Ira L. 2002. NEGLECTED POLICIES-CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND LEGAL COMMENTARY AS CIVIC EDUCATION. Durham and London: Duke |
Similar Titles:
Contres, the Court and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model
The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision-making
|
|
