|
|
|
|
Party Profiles on the Web. An Analysis of the Logfiles of Non-Partisan Interactive Political Internet Sites in the 2003 and 2004 Election Campaigns in Belgium. |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In recent years, nonpartisan “Party ProfileWebsites” (PPWs) have become hugely popular
in various countries with multiparty systems, like Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands,
sometimes even attracting 25 per cent of all voters. On these interactive websites, PPW
users respond to a number of policy questions, and these answers are used to calculate the
distance between their own preferences and party programs, resulting in an individualized
“party profile”. PPWs can be seen as one of the few innovations in election campaigning,
fully exploiting the interactive opportunities created by the internet. Our analysis of the
logfiles of the 2003 and 2004 Belgian PPWs demonstrate that PPW users tend to be highly
educated, male and young, but as the campaigns progresses, these characteristics do become
less outspoken. Following PPW users on a day to day basis shows that policy preferences of
late users (the final days before the elections) are not more crystallized or outspoken than
those of early PPW users (one month before the elections). We close with some speculations
about what this finding might tell us about campaign dynamics. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
parti (182), user (129), pro (75), 2003 (74), ppw (73), 2004 (70), elect (70), polit (67), campaign (58), use (54), internet (52), le (48), vote (41), voter (39), inform (38), day (37), websit (34), prefer (34), given (33), 0 (32), 1 (30), |
Author's Keywords:
|
election campaigns, internet, party profile website, campaign effects, Belgium, elections, interactive internet use |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Hooghe, Marc. and Teepe, Wouter. "Party Profiles on the Web. An Analysis of the Logfiles of Non-Partisan Interactive Political Internet Sites in the 2003 and 2004 Election Campaigns in Belgium." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2008-12-12 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41662_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Hooghe, M. and Teepe, W. , 2005-09-01 "Party Profiles on the Web. An Analysis of the Logfiles of Non-Partisan Interactive Political Internet Sites in the 2003 and 2004 Election Campaigns in Belgium." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2008-12-12 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41662_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In recent years, nonpartisan “Party ProfileWebsites” (PPWs) have become hugely popular
in various countries with multiparty systems, like Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands,
sometimes even attracting 25 per cent of all voters. On these interactive websites, PPW
users respond to a number of policy questions, and these answers are used to calculate the
distance between their own preferences and party programs, resulting in an individualized
“party profile”. PPWs can be seen as one of the few innovations in election campaigning,
fully exploiting the interactive opportunities created by the internet. Our analysis of the
logfiles of the 2003 and 2004 Belgian PPWs demonstrate that PPW users tend to be highly
educated, male and young, but as the campaigns progresses, these characteristics do become
less outspoken. Following PPW users on a day to day basis shows that policy preferences of
late users (the final days before the elections) are not more crystallized or outspoken than
those of early PPW users (one month before the elections). We close with some speculations
about what this finding might tell us about campaign dynamics. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
10214 |
| Text sample: |
| Party Proï¬les on the Web An Analysis of the Log Files of Nonpartisan Interactive Political Internet Sites in the 2003 and 2004 Election Campaigns in Belgium Marc Hooghe∗ Wouter Teepe†July 5 2005 Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA) Washington D.C. 2005. Abstract In recent years nonpartisan “Party Proï¬le Websites†(PPWs) have become hugely popular in various countries with multiparty systems like Germany Belgium and the Netherlands sometimes even attracting 25 |
| cent in 2004. 19 The 2000 elections were elections at the communal level and at this level 295 different local political parties exist. These jointly make up the section “other†of the 2000 elections column. In 2003 there were elections for both the Chamber and the Senate. Shown here are the results for the Chamber. In 2004 there were elections for the Flemish parliament and the European parliament. Shown here are the results for the Flemish parliament. 20 We |
Similar Titles:
Voters’ Attention, Perceived Effects, and Voting Preferences: Negative Political Advertising in the 2006 Ohio Governor’s Election
The Potential of the Internet as a Campaign Tool: The Relationship Between Incumbency, Political Party, Election Outcomes and the Relative Quality of Campaign Websites
|
|