FAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Citation
Democratic Vs. Postrevolutionary Authoritarian Regimes: Organized Labor, Regime Formation and International Labor Politics in the United States and Mexico (1910-1940)
Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. View Document as HTML: Click here to view the document
Abstract:
The purpose of this work is to place Mexico and the United States in comparative perspective and identify the most important dimensions of elite control over mass political participation�particularly of organized labor�in two different political regimes: a democratic and a postrevolutionary authoritarian one. For this, I will analyze how the linkages between the state and labor organizations influenced patterns of political change in the first decades of the XX century. At the same time, I will examine the dynamics of the Mexican-American labor alliance, and its impact in the process of political and institutional reform. This paper will be divided into three parts and the period of analysis will cover the years from 1910 to 1940. The first two sections will provide a historical account of the developments and role of organized labor in the process of political and institutional change in the two countries. The third part will present a comparative analysis developed at three levels: a) the process of regime formation; b) the participation of the labor movement, and c) the dynamics of international labor politics. In sum, with this work, I will try to demonstrate that in two different political regimes�a democratic and a postrevolutionary authoritarian one�institutional arrangements developed in a very similar way at a certain point of time. And even more important, I will try to show how the process of political and institutional reform in Mexico was, in certain way, influenced by the United States, and how in this period the role of the labor movement was determinant.
Most Common Document Word Stems: labor (255), polit (179), state (138), organ (126), mexico (119), worker (118), mexican (110), union (107), govern (105), new (98), american (96), movement (76), parti (74), nation (71), unit (64), support (63), leader (54), crom (50), import (50), power (50), regim (49),

Author's Keywords: Democratic regime; postrevolutionary authoritarian regime; Organized Labor; International Labor Politics	Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62789_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Correa-Cabrera, Guadalupe. "Democratic Vs. Postrevolutionary Authoritarian Regimes: Organized Labor, Regime Formation and International Labor Politics in the United States and Mexico (1910-1940)" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 Online <.PDF>. 2008-06-28 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62789_index.html>

Correa-Cabrera, G. (2003, Aug) "Democratic Vs. Postrevolutionary Authoritarian Regimes: Organized Labor, Regime Formation and International Labor Politics in the United States and Mexico (1910-1940)" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF> Retrieved 2008-06-28 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62789_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The purpose of this work is to place Mexico and the United States in comparative perspective and identify the most important dimensions of elite control over mass political participation�particularly of organized labor�in two different political regimes: a democratic and a postrevolutionary authoritarian one. For this, I will analyze how the linkages between the state and labor organizations influenced patterns of political change in the first decades of the XX century. At the same time, I will examine the dynamics of the Mexican-American labor alliance, and its impact in the process of political and institutional reform. This paper will be divided into three parts and the period of analysis will cover the years from 1910 to 1940. The first two sections will provide a historical account of the developments and role of organized labor in the process of political and institutional change in the two countries. The third part will present a comparative analysis developed at three levels: a) the process of regime formation; b) the participation of the labor movement, and c) the dynamics of international labor politics. In sum, with this work, I will try to demonstrate that in two different political regimes�a democratic and a postrevolutionary authoritarian one�institutional arrangements developed in a very similar way at a certain point of time. And even more important, I will try to show how the process of political and institutional reform in Mexico was, in certain way, influenced by the United States, and how in this period the role of the labor movement was determinant.

Multi-Level Governance and Civil Society: Comparing Non-State Actors in International Organizations Theoretical Aspects on NGO- Participation in the United Nations and the European Union

Race and the State: The Importance of Original Incorporation in the Development of the United States for the Current Political-Social-Economic Status of National-Origin Groups