FAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Citation
Presidential Agenda Power and Decision-Making in Presidential Regimes: Governors and Political Parties in the Brazilian Congress
Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. View Document as HTML: Click here to view the document
Abstract:
According to a widely held view of Brazilian politics, part of the difficulties presidents find in governing the country stem from the fact that national legislators respond to state pressures rather than to partisan and national considerations. Owing to their institutional position, governors not only influence national debates, but are also able to determine outcomes via the control they exert over their states? legislative delegations. We investigate this view?s empirical validity through the analysis of two data sets. We first examine legislative behavior through roll call votes in the Brazilian Lower House on a set of measures that redefined the federalist pact established in 1988 in favor of the central government. We show that Brazilian legislators do not behave any differently when they vote on measures that are likely to generate a clash between governors and the central government, that is, the measures over which the governors are likely to exert the strongest pressure on their state delegations. We then examine the impact of several political and partisan variables on the distribution of the federal investment budget to the states. The argument we test is that the influence of governors on the behavior of legislators is stronger than the influence of the president and political parties, and that the source of this influence is eminently institutional. In other words, that the influence of governors over the behavior of national legislators is a product of the political, administrative and fiscal autonomy granted to the states by the 1988-constitution. We show that governors do indeed matter for the allocation of budgetary funds to the state. Yet, they matter not because of their institutional position, but because of their political and partisan identity. We conclude the paper with a discussion of the mechanisms that explain the ability of the central government to change the federal status quo in an environment that is, at the surface, completely hostile to any changes. Check author's web site for an updated version of the paper.
Most Common Document Word Stems: state (173), 0 (125), legisl (125), govern (115), governor (99), parti (91), feder (87), polit (67), vote (67), 1 (60), resourc (58), nation (49), budget (48), presid (47), brazilian (47), deleg (44), one (44), measur (41), congress (40), 2 (39), influenc (39),

Author's Keywords: Keywords: Executive-Legislative Relations, Federalism, Legislative Behavior, Brazil,Presidentialism,Democracy	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65229_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Cheibub, Jose., Figueiredo, Argenlina. and Limongi, Fernando. "Presidential Agenda Power and Decision-Making in Presidential Regimes: Governors and Political Parties in the Brazilian Congress" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 Online <.PDF>. 2008-06-28 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65229_index.html>

Cheibub, J. A., Figueiredo, A. C. and Limongi, F. (2002, Aug) "Presidential Agenda Power and Decision-Making in Presidential Regimes: Governors and Political Parties in the Brazilian Congress" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF> Retrieved 2008-06-28 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65229_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: According to a widely held view of Brazilian politics, part of the difficulties presidents find in governing the country stem from the fact that national legislators respond to state pressures rather than to partisan and national considerations. Owing to their institutional position, governors not only influence national debates, but are also able to determine outcomes via the control they exert over their states? legislative delegations. We investigate this view?s empirical validity through the analysis of two data sets. We first examine legislative behavior through roll call votes in the Brazilian Lower House on a set of measures that redefined the federalist pact established in 1988 in favor of the central government. We show that Brazilian legislators do not behave any differently when they vote on measures that are likely to generate a clash between governors and the central government, that is, the measures over which the governors are likely to exert the strongest pressure on their state delegations. We then examine the impact of several political and partisan variables on the distribution of the federal investment budget to the states. The argument we test is that the influence of governors on the behavior of legislators is stronger than the influence of the president and political parties, and that the source of this influence is eminently institutional. In other words, that the influence of governors over the behavior of national legislators is a product of the political, administrative and fiscal autonomy granted to the states by the 1988-constitution. We show that governors do indeed matter for the allocation of budgetary funds to the state. Yet, they matter not because of their institutional position, but because of their political and partisan identity. We conclude the paper with a discussion of the mechanisms that explain the ability of the central government to change the federal status quo in an environment that is, at the surface, completely hostile to any changes. Check author's web site for an updated version of the paper.

Who Cuts the Pie? Governors, Legislators, Political Parties, and the Composition of State Budgets

Presidents, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution of Federal Resources in Argentina and Brazil