Citation

Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision-Making: Rationalist or Constructivist?

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

What difference do institutional environments make? Do they primarily affect strategy, with constraining and enabling effects on behavior as rationalists hold? Or do they also affect attitudes, identities, and how interests are formulated as constructivists assert? Within a given institutional environment what impact does the ?style? of decision-making ? which beyond formal characteristics such as the decision-rule includes informal rules, norms and shared understandings ? play in determining bargaining outcomes? This article examines these questions in the context of EU decision-making by focusing on the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper). Coreper is an ideal laboratory to test these questions empirically, because this committee represents the needle?s eye through which the legislative workload of the Council flows. And the permanent representatives who live in Brussels and meet weekly to prepare upcoming ministerial meetings are exemplars of state agents given their prominence in articulating and defending national interests across the gamut of EU affairs.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

eu (89), decis (74), corep (69), make (64), institut (61), social (59), environ (48), constructivist (40), would (40), evid (39), intern (38), council (38), nation (38), interest (37), polit (37), time (36), rationalist (36), derog (36), work (36), european (36), direct (35),

Author's Keywords:

Keywords: constructivism, rationalism, European integration theory, Coreper
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65464_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Lewis, Jeffrey. "Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision-Making: Rationalist or Constructivist?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65464_index.html>

APA Citation:

Lewis, J. , 2002-08-28 "Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision-Making: Rationalist or Constructivist?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65464_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: What difference do institutional environments make? Do they primarily affect strategy, with constraining and enabling effects on behavior as rationalists hold? Or do they also affect attitudes, identities, and how interests are formulated as constructivists assert? Within a given institutional environment what impact does the ?style? of decision-making ? which beyond formal characteristics such as the decision-rule includes informal rules, norms and shared understandings ? play in determining bargaining outcomes? This article examines these questions in the context of EU decision-making by focusing on the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper). Coreper is an ideal laboratory to test these questions empirically, because this committee represents the needle?s eye through which the legislative workload of the Council flows. And the permanent representatives who live in Brussels and meet weekly to prepare upcoming ministerial meetings are exemplars of state agents given their prominence in articulating and defending national interests across the gamut of EU affairs.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: .pdf
Page count: 41
Word count: 11503
Text sample:
Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision­Making: Rationalist or Constructivist? Jeffrey Lewis Department of Political Science Oklahoma State University 519 Mathematical Sciences Stillwater OK 74078 Phone: (405) 744­5298 Fax: (405) 744­6534 jmlewis@okstate.edu Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Boston August 28­September 1 2002. 2 Abstract: What difference do institutional environments make? Do they primarily affect strategy with constraining and enabling effects on behavior as rationalists hold? Or do they also affect attitudes
March 1996 March 1997 and April 1997. 44 Interview Brussels April 1997. 45 See for example the Financial Times ``Last Challenge to Working Hours '' April 25 1992: 4. 46 Lexus/Nexus The Times Sunday Times April 19 1992. 47 Interview Brussels March 1997. 48 Interview Brussels March 1997. 49 Financial Times ``UK Hedges Acceptance of 48­Hour Working Week '' May 1 1992: 1. 50 Key participants at the British Permrep rejected this linkage existed even implicitly. While several interview


Similar Titles:
?The Politics of Failure have Failed. We Need to Make them Work Again?, Refugees, Normative Change, and Institutional Development in the League of Nations and United Nations

National Identity in Heterogeneous Environments: Effects of Political Institutions and Social Capital

National Interests and the Development of the European Union's CFSP and ESDP: The Role of Domestic Political Preferences in Selecting the Level of Action and Institutions for Advancing Foreign and Defense Policy


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.