Author's Keywords: Keywords: Supreme Court, race, racial politics, public opinion	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65948_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Jones, Jacquie. and Mayer, Jeremy. "Racial Conservatism and Support for the Court: Did Whites Notice the Rehnquist Turn to the Right on Race?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65948_index.html>

Jones, J. and Mayer, J. D. , 2002-08-28 "Racial Conservatism and Support for the Court: Did Whites Notice the Rehnquist Turn to the Right on Race?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65948_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: From 1980 to 2000, the Supreme Court made a number of key rulings that touched on matters of race, including employment law, affirmative action, racial redistricting, and discrimination within the criminal justice system. In most of these cases, the Court took a more conservative tack towards racial matters, reflecting the increasingly conservative bent of the Court. The change in the Court, from the most liberal national institution on race from 1954-1976 (with the possible exception of 1963-68 when LBJ was in the White House), to the most conservative from 1992-2000 (with the possible exception of Congress during the 1994 Republican Revolution) , was quite dramatic. This paper examines whether support among whites for the Court was affected by the shift. In the deepest sense, does the American public follow broad changes in the Court's fundamental outlook on one of the most enduring issues in American politics?

The Arrival of the ???Other??? and General and Specific Policy Support Among Whites: The Impact of Immigration on Public Opinion

When Race Matters and When it Doesn't: How Racial Cues Shape the Ingredients of Blacks’ Opinions About Public Policies

AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND MILITARY VENTURES ABROAD: ATTENTION, EVALUATION, INVOLVEMENT, POLITICS,

The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision-making