|
|
|
|
Electoral Reform After the Election of 2000: A Study of the Impact of Politics on Policy Decisions and How Those Decisions Impact the Responsiveness of the Electoral System |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The Supreme Court of the United States? decision in Bush v. Gore generated widespread discussion and debate. Some aspects of the decision caused concern and consternation. However, regardless of partisan predilection, almost everyone expressed agreement with the Court when it stated, ?After the current counting [referring to the various ballot recounts in Florida], it is likely legislative bodies nationwide will examine ways to improve the mechanisms and machinery for voting.? The circumstances surrounding the presidential election of 2000, epitomized by the extraordinary series of events in the state of Florida, provided abundant evidence that a state-by-state critical analysis of the current electoral system as administered by those states was sorely needed. Surely, regardless of party affiliation, state legislators could be expected to act in response to the troubling events that occurred in Florida, and the resulting admonitions implicit in the Bush v. Gore decision. It seemed logical to assume that state legislators would move expeditiously to ferret out inadequacies in their state?s electoral structure and enact legislation mandating necessary changes to electoral systems. But have they done so or can it be reasonably anticipated that they will? Has the Court?s oblique call-to-action actually generated any meaningful electoral reform at the state level, or at least some serious and substantial movement in that direction? This paper examines what has occurred regarding state-level electoral reform in the year following Bush v. Gore, finds that little if any reform has taken place, and proffers the incentive for political elites to retain their position of power and the consequent reluctance to alter the electoral status quo as a partial explanation the paucity of electoral reform that has been implemented at the state level since the 2000 election. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
polit (158), elector (156), state (146), reform (117), elect (105), parti (70), 2000 (62), vote (55), domin (53), legisl (45), competit (40), one (37), power (34), control (34), system (33), voter (33), american (30), elit (28), level (27), variabl (26), 2001 (25), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Keywords: elections, electoral, reform, elites, state-level, legislative, competition, dominance, motivation, reelect, voter, turnout, manipulation, laws, mobilization,2000, Bush, Gore, Florida |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Greco, Donald. "Electoral Reform After the Election of 2000: A Study of the Impact of Politics on Policy Decisions and How Those Decisions Impact the Responsiveness of the Electoral System" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66173_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Greco, D. E. , 2002-08-28 "Electoral Reform After the Election of 2000: A Study of the Impact of Politics on Policy Decisions and How Those Decisions Impact the Responsiveness of the Electoral System" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66173_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The Supreme Court of the United States? decision in Bush v. Gore generated widespread discussion and debate. Some aspects of the decision caused concern and consternation. However, regardless of partisan predilection, almost everyone expressed agreement with the Court when it stated, ?After the current counting [referring to the various ballot recounts in Florida], it is likely legislative bodies nationwide will examine ways to improve the mechanisms and machinery for voting.? The circumstances surrounding the presidential election of 2000, epitomized by the extraordinary series of events in the state of Florida, provided abundant evidence that a state-by-state critical analysis of the current electoral system as administered by those states was sorely needed. Surely, regardless of party affiliation, state legislators could be expected to act in response to the troubling events that occurred in Florida, and the resulting admonitions implicit in the Bush v. Gore decision. It seemed logical to assume that state legislators would move expeditiously to ferret out inadequacies in their state?s electoral structure and enact legislation mandating necessary changes to electoral systems. But have they done so or can it be reasonably anticipated that they will? Has the Court?s oblique call-to-action actually generated any meaningful electoral reform at the state level, or at least some serious and substantial movement in that direction? This paper examines what has occurred regarding state-level electoral reform in the year following Bush v. Gore, finds that little if any reform has taken place, and proffers the incentive for political elites to retain their position of power and the consequent reluctance to alter the electoral status quo as a partial explanation the paucity of electoral reform that has been implemented at the state level since the 2000 election. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
8630 |
| Text sample: |
| Electoral Reform After the Election of 2000: A Study of the Impact of Politics on Policy Decisions and How Those Decisions Impact the Responsiveness of the Electoral System Donald Edward Greco Baylor University Waco Texas This paper was prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association at Boston Massachusetts August 2002. Please do not cite or quote this paper without prior permission from the author. 1 Abstract The Supreme Court of the United States' |
| Martin's Task Force and Other Investigative Reports Caltech/MIT Voting Technology report. ``Voting -- What Is What Could Be.'' January 18 2000 Common Cause 2001 Election Reform Report Card. ``Not Making the Grade: A Year After Florida Little Action In States On Election Reform.'' Constitution Report Election Reform Progress Report. Democratic Investigative Staff of the House Judiciary Committee Report August 20 2001. Election Reform Information Project October 22 2001. National Association of Secretary of States report ``StatebyState Election Reform Best |
Similar Titles:
Politics and Ethnicity in State Electoral Reforms After Election 2000
The Effects of Electoral Reform on the Belgian Party System: Strategic Adaptation at the Voter and the Party Elite Level
|
|