|
|
|
|
Modeling Hegemony Using Both Power and Ideas as Endogenous Variables in a Positivist Theory of International Relations |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
What role do ideas play in the establishment and maintenance of hegemony? The proposed paper seeks to answer these questions by building upon the model of international relations (Role Realignment theory) described in International Political Science Review 24/1 (January 2003), and refined in The Precarious Balance Revisited: The War on Terrorism and System Transformation (CEISA/ISA Conference, Budapest, 26-28 June 2003). The paper will explore the proposition that this theory sheds light on the process of endogenous norm generation in international relations. The model incorporates ideas/ideology as endogenous variables alongside traditional measures of power in a closed-system model that emphasizes the process dynamics through which ideas/ideologies compete for acceptance/dominance in international relations. The four major variables (foreign policy role elements) are operationalized using metrics that can be tested historically, producing an explanatory rather than a normative theory. Findings will emphasize U.S. foreign policy role behavior and its impact on America's leading role in world affairs. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
role (92), power (72), state (60), intern (45), polici (44), foreign (40), system (37), theori (29), doran (29), actor (27), compon (23), use (20), relat (19), cycl (19), 2003 (16), polit (15), perform (15), structur (15), one (15), also (14), neorealist (13), |
Author's Keywords:
|
international relations theory, neorealism, social constructivism, endogenous norm generation, hegemony, metastability |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Lahneman, William. "Modeling Hegemony Using Both Power and Ideas as Endogenous Variables in a Positivist Theory of International Relations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 17, 2004 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72392_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Lahneman, W. J. , 2004-03-17 "Modeling Hegemony Using Both Power and Ideas as Endogenous Variables in a Positivist Theory of International Relations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72392_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: What role do ideas play in the establishment and maintenance of hegemony? The proposed paper seeks to answer these questions by building upon the model of international relations (Role Realignment theory) described in International Political Science Review 24/1 (January 2003), and refined in The Precarious Balance Revisited: The War on Terrorism and System Transformation (CEISA/ISA Conference, Budapest, 26-28 June 2003). The paper will explore the proposition that this theory sheds light on the process of endogenous norm generation in international relations. The model incorporates ideas/ideology as endogenous variables alongside traditional measures of power in a closed-system model that emphasizes the process dynamics through which ideas/ideologies compete for acceptance/dominance in international relations. The four major variables (foreign policy role elements) are operationalized using metrics that can be tested historically, producing an explanatory rather than a normative theory. Findings will emphasize U.S. foreign policy role behavior and its impact on America's leading role in world affairs. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
11 |
| Word count: |
4054 |
| Text sample: |
| Foreign Policy Role from the Constructivist and Power Cycle Perspectives By William J. Lahneman Ph.D. School of Public Policy University of Maryland Lahneman@umd.edu 301-405-7602 Prepared for Delivery at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association Honolulu Hawaii 3 March 2005 1 Foreword This paper is part of an ongoing project to explore the concept of “foreign policy role” developed in Charles Doran’s Power Cycle Theory. Other works in this effort include: Lahneman William J. (2004) “”Modeling Hegemony Using |
| American Power. New York: Basic Books. Organski A. F. K. and Kugler Jacek. (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Rosenau J.N. (1969) Linkage Politics: Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems. New York: The Free Press. Ruggie John G. (1998) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (Autumn): 855-885. Wendt Alexander. (1992) “Anarchy is What States Make of It.” International Organization 46: 391-425. _____. (1999) Social Theory |
Similar Titles:
Why do states choose certain normative strategies over others in world politics? Interrogating theories of normative state agency in International Relations.
Imposing States: Great Power Competition, International Organisations, and the Re-Shaping of Domestic Politics through Non-State Actors
Regulating E-Commerce: Domestic Sources of State Power and the Role of State-Private Actor Relations
|
|