|
|
|
|
Diplomatic Culture and the New American Empire |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The U.S. preference for bilateral diplomacy (in which Washington is almost always the dominant party) while allowing a circumscribed admixture of multilateral diplomacy (in which it is at least primus inter pares) is evolving towards a new form of unilateral - or hegemonic - diplomacy. On this view, hegemonic diplomacy goes further than a belief in the inherent wisdom of American values backed by raw but beneficent use of its military and economic power. It presumes that the traditional Westphalian diplomatic culture and norms do not generally apply to the hegemon. This paper explores these claims and considers whether the current eclipse of State Department diplomats (the soft power agents of persuasion) by the Defense and intelligence departments (the hard power agents of brute force) reveals merely a short-term bureaucratic marginalization or rather more ominously portends a new form of American diplomacy. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
diplomat (148), cultur (116), diplomaci (95), state (76), intern (64), us (62), new (44), foreign (37), world (36), american (35), see (35), polici (35), societi (33), administr (31), war (30), relat (29), bush (28), norm (27), bull (26), also (24), iraq (23), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Wiseman, Geoffrey. "Diplomatic Culture and the New American Empire" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 17, 2004 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72393_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Wiseman, G. R. , 2004-03-17 "Diplomatic Culture and the New American Empire" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72393_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The U.S. preference for bilateral diplomacy (in which Washington is almost always the dominant party) while allowing a circumscribed admixture of multilateral diplomacy (in which it is at least primus inter pares) is evolving towards a new form of unilateral - or hegemonic - diplomacy. On this view, hegemonic diplomacy goes further than a belief in the inherent wisdom of American values backed by raw but beneficent use of its military and economic power. It presumes that the traditional Westphalian diplomatic culture and norms do not generally apply to the hegemon. This paper explores these claims and considers whether the current eclipse of State Department diplomats (the soft power agents of persuasion) by the Defense and intelligence departments (the hard power agents of brute force) reveals merely a short-term bureaucratic marginalization or rather more ominously portends a new form of American diplomacy. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
16 |
| Word count: |
8804 |
| Text sample: |
| Annual convention of the International Studies Association Montreal Canada March 17–20 2004 PANEL ON SUBTANTIATING DIPLOMATIC CULTURE “Diplomatic Culture and the ‘New American Empire’” Geoffrey Wiseman University of Southern California School of International Relations 3518 Trousdale Parkway Von KleinSmid Center 330 Los Angeles CA 90089-0043 USA Abstract A deeply-rooted state-based “diplomatic culture” has evolved over several centuries extending across regions and embracing nation-states of all kinds. This culture – with its own distinctive institutions values and norms – is |
| of the radical post-colonial states. So long as the domination view prevails in Washington there is likely to be support from most of the world’s 190 states and their peoples to re-affirm support for diplomacy. This predicted recovery of faith in diplomacy however should not be interpreted as an argument for a return to conventional diplomatic practices in their bilateral and multilateral forms. It is important not only to re-think these traditional forms but also to explore new ones |
Similar Titles:
Military Culture, the Rule of Law, and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Role of the US Military in American Opposition to the International Criminal Court
Malaysia-US Relations in the Post September 11, 2001: The Delemma of a Moderate Islamic State Foreign Policy in a Hegemonic World
The United States, the International Criminal Court, and Bilateral Immunity Agreements: Explaining the Resistance of Weak States and Consequences for American Foreign Policy
|
|