Citation

From State-Supported Terrorism to the Terrorist-Supported State: Explaining the Effective Operation of Modern International Terrorism

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

While al-Qaeda’s operations and financing networks are an important component of their success, they do not represent historically unique mechanisms in terrorist operations. What has changed, we contend, is the nature of the international environment in which terrorist groups operate and the change in the nature of the relationship that terrorist groups have with nation-states who cooperate with them.
While scholars have examined the impact of globalization on the capacity of terrorist groups to operate, globalization cannot completely explain the success and growing threat of international terrorism. Scholars have also pointed to the ability of terrorist groups to take advantage of conditions in weak or failed states to promote their operations. Again, we contend that this relationship is not enough to explain the conditions under which international terrorism flourishes. Instead, we argue that the combination of an unregulated international economic environment, promoted under the guise of globalization, and a change in the relationship that terrorist groups have with weak and failed states have created an environment that has allowed terrorist groups to increase their power and operating capacity in the international system.
In making this argument, we highlight three important conceptual issues. First, the nature and methods of terrorist financing, recently highlighted through accounts of al-Qaeda’s activities, are not new. These same mechanisms were used by groups that pre-date al-Qaeda’s appearance on the international scene. Most prevalent amongst these groups was the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Second, the movement toward deregulation of the international economy, which established the foundations for the latest and strongest period of globalization (or interdependence), helped to create an environment that allowed terrorists to operate more clandestinely, particularly in their financing operations. Third, the relationship that terrorist groups have had with states that either support or are sympathetic to them has changed. Following the collapse of the Cold War and the proliferation of weak and failed states in its wake, terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, were able to form relationships of two kinds with state partners. In cases where the terrorist group built a relationship with a weak state, the conditions for terrorist-supported states emerged such that the state was dependent upon the terrorist group for assistance. In a failed state, a state lacking the capacity to govern its own territory, terrorist groups exploited the unregulated environment and formed symbiotic relationships groups that were competing for power. Hence, unregulated or poorly governed environments at both the state and international level have promoted ideal conditions for stronger, more powerful and effective terrorist organizations to emerge. We highlight these conditions in case studies of the Palestine Liberation Organization and al-Qaeda, emphasizing the similar funding mechanisms each group employed and the differing nature of each group’s relationship with weak states.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

state (255), al (121), 2002 (114), plo (107), qaeda (107), al-qaeda (99), intern (85), terrorist (82), weak (71), new (67), global (65), fund (63), organ (60), support (59), terror (56), group (51), 2001 (49), york (44), financ (44), govern (44), 2003 (43),

Author's Keywords:

terrorism, financing, weak states, failed states, PLO, al-Qaeda, globalization
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Studies Association
URL:
http://www.isanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73693_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Croswell, Alexandra., Ostergard, Jr., Robert. and Tubin, Matthew. "From State-Supported Terrorism to the Terrorist-Supported State: Explaining the Effective Operation of Modern International Terrorism" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 17, 2004 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73693_index.html>

APA Citation:

Croswell, A. , Ostergard, Jr., R. L. and Tubin, M. R. , 2004-03-17 "From State-Supported Terrorism to the Terrorist-Supported State: Explaining the Effective Operation of Modern International Terrorism" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73693_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: While al-Qaeda’s operations and financing networks are an important component of their success, they do not represent historically unique mechanisms in terrorist operations. What has changed, we contend, is the nature of the international environment in which terrorist groups operate and the change in the nature of the relationship that terrorist groups have with nation-states who cooperate with them.
While scholars have examined the impact of globalization on the capacity of terrorist groups to operate, globalization cannot completely explain the success and growing threat of international terrorism. Scholars have also pointed to the ability of terrorist groups to take advantage of conditions in weak or failed states to promote their operations. Again, we contend that this relationship is not enough to explain the conditions under which international terrorism flourishes. Instead, we argue that the combination of an unregulated international economic environment, promoted under the guise of globalization, and a change in the relationship that terrorist groups have with weak and failed states have created an environment that has allowed terrorist groups to increase their power and operating capacity in the international system.
In making this argument, we highlight three important conceptual issues. First, the nature and methods of terrorist financing, recently highlighted through accounts of al-Qaeda’s activities, are not new. These same mechanisms were used by groups that pre-date al-Qaeda’s appearance on the international scene. Most prevalent amongst these groups was the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Second, the movement toward deregulation of the international economy, which established the foundations for the latest and strongest period of globalization (or interdependence), helped to create an environment that allowed terrorists to operate more clandestinely, particularly in their financing operations. Third, the relationship that terrorist groups have had with states that either support or are sympathetic to them has changed. Following the collapse of the Cold War and the proliferation of weak and failed states in its wake, terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, were able to form relationships of two kinds with state partners. In cases where the terrorist group built a relationship with a weak state, the conditions for terrorist-supported states emerged such that the state was dependent upon the terrorist group for assistance. In a failed state, a state lacking the capacity to govern its own territory, terrorist groups exploited the unregulated environment and formed symbiotic relationships groups that were competing for power. Hence, unregulated or poorly governed environments at both the state and international level have promoted ideal conditions for stronger, more powerful and effective terrorist organizations to emerge. We highlight these conditions in case studies of the Palestine Liberation Organization and al-Qaeda, emphasizing the similar funding mechanisms each group employed and the differing nature of each group’s relationship with weak states.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available International Studies Association

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 39
Word count: 13999
Text sample:
From State-Supported Terrorism to the Terrorist-Supported State: Explaining the Effective Operation of Modern International Terrorism by Alexandra Croswell Department of Political Science Binghamton University State University of New York Robert L. Ostergard Jr. Institute of Global Cultural Studies & Department of Political Science Binghamton University State University of New York Matthew Tubin Department of Political Science University of Pennsylvania Prepared for presentation at the 45th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association Montreal Quebec Canada 17-20 March 2004. Note:
Campaign Aimed at U.S.” New York Times. 7 February. Weintraub Sidney. 2002. “Disrupting the Financing of Terrorism.” The Washington Quarterly. Winter 2002 25:1 53-60. Wells Jonathan Jack Meyers and Maggie Mulvihill. 2001. “War on Terrorism Saudi Elite Tied to Money Groups Linked to bin Laden.” Boston Herald. 14 October. Winer Jonathan and Trifin Roule. 2002. “Fighting Terrorist Finance.” Survival. Autumn Vol. 44 no. 3. Wisgerhof Amy. 1999. “International Non-State Terrorism and Transstate Paradigm.” Low Intensity Conflict & Law Enforcement.


Similar Titles:
Privatized Global Governance: Direct Participation of Industry and Interest Group in International Organizations

The Organization of Terror: Patterns of Recruitment, Allegiance, and Support Networks in Terrorist Groups

The International Organization for Standardization, Non-State Market-Driven Governance and the Struggle for the Soul of Global Business

Global Organized Terror: Emerging Relationships between Terrorist and Organized Crime Groups

Winning the Global War on Terrorism: The Role of Governance in a Determining a State's Proclivity to Harbor Terrorists


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.