Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: The Midwest Political Science Association URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p84447_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Ponder, Benjamin. "The United States and the Jurisdiction of International Courts: A Comparative Case Study of United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Hearings from 1924, 1931, 1946, and 2000" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 15, 2004 <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p84447_index.html>

Ponder, B. , 2004-04-15 "The United States and the Jurisdiction of International Courts: A Comparative Case Study of United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Hearings from 1924, 1931, 1946, and 2000" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois <Not Available>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p84447_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Through a close reading of four separate public hearings of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, this paper probes the underlying logic of American ambivalence toward international courts across the 20th century. The comparative case studies represent debate surrounding American adherence to the Permanent Court of International Justice (1924 and 1931), the International Court of Justice (1946), and the International Criminal Court (2000). Fundamental popular conflicts between notions of compulsory jurisdiction and national sovereignty are highlighted.

The United States, the International Criminal Court, and Bilateral Immunity Agreements: Explaining the Resistance of Weak States and Consequences for American Foreign Policy

War on Terrorism and EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: A Case Study of the New Multilateralism in International Relations