Author's Keywords: Immunization, NIS	Convention All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Association For Public Opinion Association URL: http://www.aapor.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p15855_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Khare, Meena ., Piccinino, Linda. and Battaglia, Michael. "An Assessment of the Quality of Health Data Collected from Multiple Sources: Registries, Provider Records, and Household Reports" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association For Public Opinion Association, Fontainebleau Resort, Miami Beach, FL, <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p15855_index.html>

Khare, M. , Piccinino, L. and Battaglia, M. "An Assessment of the Quality of Health Data Collected from Multiple Sources: Registries, Provider Records, and Household Reports" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association For Public Opinion Association, Fontainebleau Resort, Miami Beach, FL <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p15855_index.html

Publication Type: Paper/Poster Proposal Abstract: Incomplete or missing data due to unit or item-nonresponse in a survey generally impact the survey quality. Also, collecting the same information from multiple sources in a survey is likely to yield differences in reporting of key outcome measures. The CDC-sponsored National Immunization Survey (NIS) is designed to measure and monitor vaccine-specific coverage rates among children aged 19-35 months in the United States. NIS, a large on-going telephone survey, consists of a list-assisted random-digit-dialing (RDD) telephone survey of the parents/guardians of the eligible children, followed by a mail survey of the children's immunization providers to obtain immunization histories from medical records. Approximately 45% of the children with complete household interviews have vaccination data from a written shot card. In 2002, we implemented a pilot study to investigate completeness and quality of the immunization histories from four immunization registries. The objective for this paper is to examine the completeness and quality of the vaccination data received for the sampled children from each of the three sources-- registries, provider records, and written shot cards. We compare vaccine-specific shot dates, number of doses and coverage rates for the vaccination series 4:3:1:3 [4 or more doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTaP), 3 or more doses of poliovirus vaccine, 1 or more doses of measles measles containing vaccine (MCV), 3 or more doses of Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine (Hib)]. We also assess the feasibility of developing ‘best value’ estimates by supplementing provider-reported vaccination data from other two sources.

Reporting the frequency of household tasks by elderly respondents: the effect of different interview strategies on data quality

Collecting Data in Multiple Languages: Evidence of the Need for Non-English Interviews in a Survey on Children’s Health

Effect of Incentives on Data Collection: A Record of Calls Analysis of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Assessing the Quality of Height and Weight Data Collected During Telephone Interviews

Validating Health Insurance Coverage Self-Reports: A Comparison Between Self-Reported Coverage and Administrative Data Records