|
|
|
|
Ideology, Issue Preferences, and Political Choice: The Paradox of “Conflicted Conservatives” |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
Macro-level studies of public opinion have noticed a seeming paradox in American public opinion: the American electorate is operationally liberal, but symbolically and ideologically conservative. The mass public, in other words, holds liberal preferences on a wide range of spending, social, and cultural issues, but identifies primarily as politically “conservative.” At the micro level, this “paradox” means that a large segment of the population possesses conflicted political preferences, identifying as ideologically conservative, but holding predominantly liberal positions on issues. These “conflicted conservatives,” who comprise around one-fifth of the American public and identify in roughly equal numbers with the Democratic and Republican parties, present an interesting and important puzzle for scholars of public opinion.
This paper builds on the ideological self-identification and elite framing literatures to develop a micro-level theory for the preponderance of “conflicted conservatives.” In both political and non-political contexts, the word “conservative” is both more multidimensional and more popular than the word “liberal.” Because of the way arguments are framed by party elites, religious and cultural leaders, and the mass media, the dominant messages that citizens receive from political elites are themselves conflicted in a way that leads certain segments of the mass public to identify as “conservative” despite holding predominantly liberal issue preferences. The idea of “conflicted conservatives” suggests that the meanings of ideological terms—and the use of ideology in structuring mass decision making—are more multifaceted than is often assumed. The impact of ideology on political choices is not simply conditioned by education and sophistication; rather, ideological terms mean substantively different things to different groups of people. These findings have implications for the study of both mass opinion and American electoral dynamics. |
|
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Association For Public Opinion Association
URL: http://www.aapor.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Ellis, Christopher. "Ideology, Issue Preferences, and Political Choice: The Paradox of “Conflicted Conservatives”" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association For Public Opinion Association, Fontainebleau Resort, Miami Beach, FL, <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p16838_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Ellis, C. "Ideology, Issue Preferences, and Political Choice: The Paradox of “Conflicted Conservatives”" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association For Public Opinion Association, Fontainebleau Resort, Miami Beach, FL <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p16838_index.html |
Publication Type: Paper/Poster Proposal
Abstract: Macro-level studies of public opinion have noticed a seeming paradox in American public opinion: the American electorate is operationally liberal, but symbolically and ideologically conservative. The mass public, in other words, holds liberal preferences on a wide range of spending, social, and cultural issues, but identifies primarily as politically “conservative.” At the micro level, this “paradox” means that a large segment of the population possesses conflicted political preferences, identifying as ideologically conservative, but holding predominantly liberal positions on issues. These “conflicted conservatives,” who comprise around one-fifth of the American public and identify in roughly equal numbers with the Democratic and Republican parties, present an interesting and important puzzle for scholars of public opinion.
This paper builds on the ideological self-identification and elite framing literatures to develop a micro-level theory for the preponderance of “conflicted conservatives.” In both political and non-political contexts, the word “conservative” is both more multidimensional and more popular than the word “liberal.” Because of the way arguments are framed by party elites, religious and cultural leaders, and the mass media, the dominant messages that citizens receive from political elites are themselves conflicted in a way that leads certain segments of the mass public to identify as “conservative” despite holding predominantly liberal issue preferences. The idea of “conflicted conservatives” suggests that the meanings of ideological terms—and the use of ideology in structuring mass decision making—are more multifaceted than is often assumed. The impact of ideology on political choices is not simply conditioned by education and sophistication; rather, ideological terms mean substantively different things to different groups of people. These findings have implications for the study of both mass opinion and American electoral dynamics. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
The New Ideology? Accessibilty, Religiosity, Issue Preferences and Political Partisanship in American Politics
Ideology, Issue Preferences, and Political Choice: The Paradox of Conflicted Conservatives
|
|
